Another unleaded 100LL replacement approved (Swift 100R)

It's a start- just two models for now.
This seems promising, from the same article
A third unleaded avgas candidate—UL100E—is undergoing full-scale engine and airframe testing under the FAA’s Piston Engine Aviation Fuels Initiative, which could lead to the agency granting fleetwide authorization for its use in 2025.
 
Cool!

How long until we start seeing exhaust gas sensors and FADEC with true closed-loop control?
 
2016

2018
 
Cool!

How long until we start seeing exhaust gas sensors and FADEC with true closed-loop control?
Just to remind everyone... there is at least one progressive piston GA manufacturer... full FADEC is found in the Diamond DA40NG, DA42, DA50, and DA62 models (all with diesel engines burning JetA).
Wayne
 
What the industry is really waiting on is blanket approval of a drop in replacement for 100LL, no STC or paperwork needed. Something that an FBO could just start ordering tomorrow instead of 100LL.

However I don't think the FAA or manufacturers have the stomach for it, no one wants to be liable for even one incident that could be remotely traced back to UL.
 
The fact that aviation is currently 50+ years behind every other industry that uses internal combustion engines is not a reason to block progress.
And both Continental and Lycoming have gone there, and no one wanted to buy them
 
What the industry is really waiting on is blanket approval of a drop in replacement for 100LL, no STC or paperwork needed. Something that an FBO could just start ordering tomorrow instead of 100LL.

However I don't think the FAA or manufacturers have the stomach for it, no one wants to be liable for even one incident that could be remotely traced back to UL.
That is not going to happen, because the FAA doesn't have the authority to do that. And the type certificates call for ASTM 910 fuel, which requires it to contain lead.

Even Swift is going STC. But they also say it won't work in all the fleet anyway. Not very drop in.

Also, interested thread comments over on BT. The supercharge rating (the second number in 80/87, 91/96, 100/130, and 115/145) is something over 150 for G100UL, raising the possibility to run higher boost for turbo charged engines for take off and other full throttle operations. Meaning more HP.
 
And both Continental and Lycoming have gone there, and no one wanted to buy them
Sure, but when you don't have the right fuel for the control system, why would you buy?

UL fuel is the catalyst required to open the door to engine controls from this century, as opposed to our current prior-century lumps.
 
Im ready for a different fuel. I run as lean as I can with a carb and I still had lead fouling on my plugs when I checked them on my annual today. The pugs were easily cleaned with a piece of safety wire but my borescope pictures show lead deposits on the inside. I my start using Rec gas as they call it here in Michigan. No alcohol. I use it in my mowers and motorcycle. Might as well go in the plane too.
 
Sure, but when you don't have the right fuel for the control system, why would you buy?

UL fuel is the catalyst required to open the door to engine controls from this century, as opposed to our current prior-century lumps.
Well that, and the fact that the manufacturers like Cessna/Piper are some of the largest consumers of the Conti/Lyco engines and they'd have to do a good bit of recertification/design work in order to retrofit their aircraft to a FADEC engine. On an Experimental or a model refresh the paperwork hurdles would already be accounted for.
 
Back
Top