Today is the first day I woke up and legitimately wondered if I made a mistake having children. It just seems cruel to bring anyone into this world sometimes. I know that that there's just as much good out there as their is evil - we see and experience some of that good every time we climb into our planes, but it seems like evil is dominating.
Meanwhile, our choices are between Clinton and Trump to lead us out of this mess, and I see neither of them doing anything beyond further dividing us and exacerbating the situation. Our country is collapsing.
April 12, 1861, first shots of the Civil War.
July 7, 2016, first shots of the second Civil War?
It's never really stopped. It just ebbs and flows.
The late 19th and early 20th Centuries were times of open rebellion, especially in terms of worker movements. The combined Communist, Socialist, and Workers parties were by far the fastest-growing political segment in America; and the radical IWW, whose constitution called for the overthrow of capitalism, was the fastest-growing labor union. The CIO was pretty radical, as well, before merging with the AFL.
The 1960's were also a time of great turmoil, as anyone who lived through them can tell you. The issues were many, with the Vietnam war and the fight for civil rights probably dominating; but I think the decade as a whole is better defined by its prevailing
attitude, which can be summed up in terms like "distrust," "defiance," "counterculture" and "anti-establishment." The different factions may have had different goals, but they were united by their dissatisfaction with and rejection of the status quo, and their willingness to resist, reject, and defy it -- sometimes with riots and violence.
And yet it's hard to say who perpetrated the most violence during the 1960's: those who opposed the "establishment," or those who were defending it. It certainly can be argued that the police (including the National Guard in some cases) perpetrated a lot more violence than protestors and "rioters" ever did, and that many of the riots didn't become riots until excessive police responses to previously peaceful protests provoked and escalated them. This was especially true in the South, where police routinely responded to peaceful civil rights protests with fire hoses and tear gas. And let's not forget Selma in 1965 and Kent State in 1970.
In short, the government's response to the anger and frustration on the parts of people who were tired of being beaten down was to beat them down with a bigger club; and if that didn't work, to try fire hoses, tear gas, or ultimately bullets if need be.
So no, I can't agree with your timeline. The same civil war is still being fought. Only the intensity and the fronts have changed over the years. The main difference in the 1960's was that a variety of people who had grievances with the way things were all decided to protest at once, and even established a coalition of sorts.
Which brings me to this article:
http://www.timesunion.com/news/crim...ngs-of-black-men-stir-fears-anger-8346705.php
Not the article so much as the pictures. Go ahead and flip through them. The demonstration may have been in response to the killings of two black men, but most of the faces in that crowd are not black. Here's a good one:
People of all races are starting to get sick of this shoot first and ask questions later ****. This is not a police state, a dictatorship, or a third-world banana republic. People shouldn't die because they were selling CDs (or loosie cigarettes), or because they had a tail light out in their cars, or because they did nothing at all.
Rich