bisctboy
Pre-Flight
I'm in the market to buy an IFR Archer. I will go up to $60K for the right Archer. Let me know if you or anyone you know is looking to sell...
Best,
mkb
Best,
mkb
I'm in the market to buy an IFR Archer. I will go up to $60K for the right Archer. Let me know if you or anyone you know is looking to sell...
Best,
mkb
What! You don't want an Archer! James will be by shortly to straighten you out.
This often comes down to performance over cosmetic premiums. You can get more performance for 60K than an Archer. Cost of maintenance for gear and a propeller hub are generally overstated for this class of airplane. But sure, you could probably get a real sweet clean cherry Archer for 60K. Still goes 115KTAS and climbs like a pig when gross. Look at stretched cabin 235s and arrows for that money, and give up cosmetics. Good luck.
Only James?
If I were to do it again, a Dakota would be my choice. But your dead wrong on specs for an Archer. Cruised at 130kts, 10.5ft, 10.5 gph. Full fuel, hot summer day in the south, climb about 700-750. In winter, I'd get 1100 fpm.
OA the Archer is a great plane, annuals were $1200 no squawks, parts are easy and not expensive. Flew great. Can haul 4 real people. Cheap, reliable aero-trans and a great bang for the buck.
Nope, not dead wrong.We just agree to disagree. I got more time in PA-28-181 than I care to reminisce on, and they ain't 130knot birds, not even close. 120 on a good day. Nobody runs that engine full flog all the time that's not a rental anyways. At 180hp, 10.5gph is ****ing fuel into the engine unburned at 10k. At that altitude and that engine you should be running no more than 9gph, the rest is chem trail behind you. You're fully flogged out and barely cracking 68-70% power at that altitude anyways, on a fixed pitch prop no less. As to climb rate, it's just 180hp and the airframe is the same ol PA-28 as any other. I've had 3 up in the middle of summer and that thing did no better than 500fpm, same as my old warrior with 2 up and full fuel.
But whatever, no dog in the fight. I just think there's more bang for the buck at that price range. Updated pants stretch 235, or arrow. Dakotas are overpriced.
You are so full of **** it's staggering. Effing clueless......like you said. You have no dog in the fight.
Do you have some basic needs in said Archer? GPS, working AP, speed mods.....?
...Look at stretched cabin 235s and arrows for that money, and give up cosmetics. Good luck.
Fwiw I have seen 127kts on a GPS triangle in a '81 Archer with gap seals. Not sure what it burned, wide open and leaned until rough.
60k should buy a nice one with a decent GPS. Also easy to sell when the day to upgrade comes around.
"Well, that escalated quickly."
FWIW, my experience is far more consistent with Hindsight2020's than yours, but whatever. And ya 10.5gph and 10k feet, makes no sense to me either.
OP - Get an Arrow. Your son can do his primary training in an Arrow. You can get your IFR in an Arrow. You can also work toward your commercial in (you guessed it) an Arrow.
And in my OPINION, you'll take a bit longer to outgrow and Arrow than an Archer.
Almost forgot, when looking at Arrows.. 200HP minimum, Turbo preferred.
Hmmmm...very interesting! I just looked on Trade-A-Plane and I can get a well equipped Arrow for $60K. The truth be known, my son is interested in becoming a commercial pilot and my brother (UAL Airbus Captain) told him the best way to go to the majors was to get his college degree while getting all his certificates (PPL, IFR, Commercial, etc...) while attending college. The Arrow seems to be a better platform for this.
an arrow is not a high performance plane. only complex. if that is the route, I'd look at something different.