So you will admit I wasn't being sarcastic??
It will be invisible. I mean that on my certified ADSB In, it will not be displayed as traffic at all. It will be treated as an ADSB equipped aircraft by the GBT and therefore not broadcast as a Mode C target. Unless it is turned off, I won't see it any way.
Only the FCC has authority over the radio spectrum and radio equipment. The FAA would need to go to the FCC and point out the FCC regulation that is being violated.It will never be able to be used by you in your C152 rental after 2020 without you or the aircraft owner receiving a letter from the FAA indicating it is not compliant. If you fly into one of the airspaces that require it after 2020, you might not be able to gain entry to the airspace.
It is in clear violation of current FAA policy as it transmits as RTCA DO-282B compliant, when in fact it is not. However, I don't think the FAA is going to do anything about it for the time being.
A little education is in order. A certified ADS-B In device is required by the TSO C195A RTCA DO-317A to not display any ADS-B data received from a unit that has a SIL or SDA of zero (A GDL88 for example is TSO C195A RTCA DO-317A). All non certified devices are required to broadcast these values as zero. Claiming any other SIL or SDA indicates the unit has been certified to a specific standard by the FAA, but a portable unit has no FAA certification. If one was not accurate and coded it as being compliant with a standard, but factually it was not, then I would think the FAA could take legal action against the manufacturer.
Well correct me if I'm missing something, but as I see it: The airplane has a standard Mode-C transponder that remains active. I'm not clear how my use of a portable ADS-B unit on that same plane inactivates the existing Mode-C transponder, thus making my airplane invisible.The GBT treats any ADSB out device as a client, regardless if it is compliant or not. The GBT will therefore not consider the portable as a simple mode A/C transponder unit and will not generate a TISB report for it as it does not generate TISB reports for any aircraft identified as a client, just for non clients.
Intriguing. Seems stupid, but I suppose they want to filter out people who may be screwing it up?
Now this makes no sense. You're claiming that the GBT will receive an ADS-B out aircraft, and subsequently do nothing with it. Please detail why you think it will not put an ADS-B out aircraft into TIS-B. That is whole point of the system. TIS-B includes radar targets and ADS-B targets. I can understand it not including ME in MY TIS-B output. But you and everyone else getting a TIS-B output would see me because you're not me. Is that what you mean?
There are a LOT of airplanes that just want to comply, and keep everything else as it is.
They don't have the money to buy a WAAS GPS and make all the changes to the panel that would require. They just want a box and and antenna that replaces the old one and lets them fly in peace. For the least money possible, but keep it under 5k. 4k would be even better.
Good morning everyone
First, the IG's report was LEAKED to the Wall Street Journal and they asked AOPA to comment within minutes. It had not yet be publicly released and you can probably guess by reading the article where it came from. Without having time to fully read and digest the report, providing a comment and position to a national media outlet would not have been a smart thing to do.
I think the problem with your proposal is they plan to shut down all the radar facilities that now track transponders, so you wouldn't be seen. I personally don't think it'd be a good idea for FLIBs to be inside the "mode C veil" unseen.
Katie Pribyl showed up here to make excuses and throw out distractors to obscure her poor performance.
A golden opportunity was placed before her, a chance for millions of influential readers to hear what we thought.
And she punted.
Twiddled her thumbs. No time to think of a response, that was her excuse.
There was leak, that was one of her distractors.
So after she's done with the twiddling and fretting she posts a response on the AOPA website, where exactly zero influential non-pilots will read it. And comes here to boast about this response that nobody will see.
Katie blew it.
Or maybe it was her boss.
I'm still a member, but I sure wish we had a spokesman who can speak, not one who says "no comment" when a golden chance to be heard presents itself.
...So after she's done with the twiddling and fretting she posts a response on the AOPA website, where exactly zero influential non-pilots will read it. And comes here to boast about this response that nobody will see...
If you check the time stamps, you will see that she posted her response here five hours before she posted it on the AOPA board. (And when I first saw her post here, it was not up yet there.)
One can agree or disagree with the position AOPA has taken on ADS-B, but do we really want them shooting from the hip in a VERY public venue?
This...Some of you clearly have never worked in a PR arena. How on earth do you expect them to be able to respond to "what is your comment on this report" if they haven't seen it? Once they read it there was a response.
But I know it's much easier to whine.
They should have said 'Mistakes were made, by us' 'Wanna buy some wine?' Aopa is garbage.Some of you clearly have never worked in a PR arena. How on earth do you expect them to be able to respond to "what is your comment on this report" if they haven't seen it? Once they read it there was a response.
But I know it's much easier to whine.
Geez... If all they can say is "NO COMMENT", and the majority of the people here agree that was a BS answer.. then yeah... This public venue is the right place to vent.....
And remember.. You were the one who started the thread on the Red Board directing the attention here......
...To the pilot who asked about slide in solutions under $5K, let me be your personal shopper:
King KT-74...
Some of you clearly have never worked in a PR arena. How on earth do you expect them to be able to respond to "what is your comment on this report" if they haven't seen it? Once they read it there was a response.
But I know it's much easier to whine.
And apparently neither have you. This wasn't the National Inquirer looking for a "gotcha" quote. The was the Wall Street Journal. I'm sure they shared with the AOPA the nature of the article, and probably the report itself, even if it was leaked.
You are telling me that any reputable organization is going to provide any quote in response to "what is your stance on this report" having not reviewed it? But I'm dumb so there's that.
The answer should never be "no comment". It should be "Provide us a copy to review and we'll be glad to comment once we've digested the report."
The answer should never be "no comment". It should be "Provide us a copy to review and we'll be glad to comment once we've digested the report."
Nowhere in the article does it say aopa said 'no comment' it says no comment was provided. My guess would be the conversation went like this.
reporter - "Do you have any comment on this leaked reported that you haven't seen yet?"
aopa - "well we haven't seen the official report yet so we can't comment on a leaked and possibly incorrect/inappropriately released report. Though, we will as soon as it is released"
But, it probably makes alot more sense to fume and drool behind the keyboard assuming somebody (who represents GA) is out to 'get' GA?
The answer should never be "no comment". It should be "Provide us a copy to review and we'll be glad to comment once we've digested the report."
Which might be paraphrased by the newspaper as "the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, the trade group for general aviation, declined to comment."
Yeah, who would want to comment for a rag like the WSJ. No chance that movers and shakers would ever read that thing. Big missed opportunity.
AOPA should have an "elevator speech" regarding ADS-B that they trot out any time a question is asked. The speech doesn't have to be directly responsive to the particular question(s) being asked. Watch any news show, nobody even listens to the questions being asked, they just hit their own talking points.
Some of you clearly have never worked in a PR arena. How on earth do you expect them to be able to respond to "what is your comment on this report" if they haven't seen it? Once they read it there was a response.
But I know it's much easier to whine.