No there is not.
Yes, there is. What do you think P-73 is?
I'm talking about Mount Vernon, not the White House.
No there is not.
That is what I was thinkingOK...John Adams then...
But he is correct. There is indeed a P area over Mount Vernon. I stand corrected.Yes, there is. What do you think P-73 is?
I'm talking about Mount Vernon, not the White House.
I want a Disney style cash purchased TFR. How much will it run me?
3 maybe 4 Senators, especially ones in key committee positions.I want a Disney style cash purchased TFR. How much will it run me?
The trouble is, serving in a combat zone has pretty much become the "kiss of death" for those with the highest political ambitions. Too many things that can be re-intepreted/re-remembered later.I'm all for mandatory "character building" for any politician who votes to send anyone to war who hasn't already served a combat tour of duty in a shooting area. Front lines, and they don't get to take their security detail with them.
Don't forget Disney World in Orlando...
Sounds like they are just stretching the use of a TFR to keep VFR joyriders from orbiting the parks and being a nuisance.... I previously thought of TFR as much more restrictive than the Disney one...
The trouble is, serving in a combat zone has pretty much become the "kiss of death" for those with the highest political ambitions. Too many things that can be re-intepreted/re-remembered later.
Ron Wanttaja
The problem is that supporters of the opponent of the vet will claim his record was falsified, that he didn't spend time serving where he claimed, that he dodged actual combat or actually ran away when threatened. And they can usually find SOMEBODY who will "back up" that claim.Depends on who's voting. I rather vote for the Vet with a proven track record of having accomplished something, than a Jr. Senator with a completely covered-up past and no significant accomplishments other than warming a chair.
Mr Disney did not wish to have his captive customers looking at banners advertising competing attractions in the area. So he purchased a TFR.
The problem is that supporters of the opponent of the vet will claim his record was falsified, that he didn't spend time serving where he claimed, that he dodged actual combat or actually ran away when threatened. And they can usually find SOMEBODY who will "back up" that claim.
I'm not saying it's right, but that's how things work. Two Vietnam veterans have run for President (one from each party), both lost. Both were subject of claims regarding "alternate versions" of their experience.