Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Thanks for the link, but it really doesn't tell us the composition of the coating. I honestly haven't found anything to show which of us is correct.
That's not the only reason it's bad news. The more important reason is that the part is generally not available except as a salvage item. There is no old stock available anywhere, and no third-party source.That's really bad news, because the wings must come off for it to be replaced.
$7,500/wing plus labor, for a ball park figure on salvaged wings
several years ago one of the early victims of the cardinal spar corrosion malady actually paid Cessna to build him new wings for around $12,000 as I recall. I can only imagine what the price would be today for new ones.
The ballpark figure I've read is $4 amu for the spar, ~6 amu labor. For the carrythrough (not the wings).
I say again -- the issue is availability, not so much expense. They are NOT a stocked item, you cannot order them. A few Cardinal owners have managed to score one through contact with an owner who kept one from a salvaged aircraft. It takes a long time and a lot of legwork to find one. Many give up.
Thanks for the link, but it really doesn't tell us the composition of the coating. I honestly haven't found anything to show which of us is correct.
My Info comes directly from the US Navy's rating manual for AMS 2&3.
Back on topic, I did see something that suggests that the paint has a vastly different coefficient of expansion compared to the metal, causing the paint to crack under temperature extremes, an alodine coating doesn't have this problem.
I suspect BS- I think if the surface is prepped properly, the paint should work fine but I don't paint (or alodine) plane parts for a living.
IF he can be sure that there's no deeper corrosion that can't be seen. But yes, I'm holding out a little hope there.Your mech might be really care full and blend the corrosion out and see if it still meets the requirement.
IF he can be sure that there's no deeper corrosion that can't be seen. But yes, I'm holding out a little hope there.
the .220" you mentioned is a big number, .250 is a 1/4 inch. that's a huge amount of metal to remove and still be in tolerance. I do not have a 177 structural repair manual to say if that is the proper number or not.
He is also sending pictures out to a Cessna tech rep, but I don't have copies yet. We have the service limits from Cessna via CFO.
I tried to upload a copy of the Cessna document but I only have it as a TIFF, and the BB says "invalid file".
But here is what it says, verbatim:
"Remove all corrosion on Carry Through Spar web. The rework is serviceable if after blending and smoothing the minimum thickness is 0.22 inches or greater."
It does not say what the original thickness is. 0.25 is my guy's guess.
I tried to upload a copy of the Cessna document but I only have it as a TIFF, and the BB says "invalid file".
Can the dye test be done on a vertical surface? Or for that matter, do you have to remove the spar and immerse it?I would form a buffer pad from 400 grit wet and dry sand paper for my dremel tool and start buffing away the corrosion, when I thought it was all removed, I would dye check it, then I'd measure it to see what I have left.
Can the dye test be done on a vertical surface? Or for that matter, do you have to remove the spar and immerse it?
Scott -- yeah I know they had a jpg too but it looked like a worse quality image than the tif.
Well yeah, but I've been flying it for almost a year. This is not a new problem, it's been developing for a while. Maybe quite a while......
...When were them critters in there? And where did poor 8JT pick them up? The more recently, the better the chances the spar will be fixable. Yet my mechanic says he's never before seen any evidence of mice in the metal hangars at VLL, and he's worked on a lot of airplanes here over quite a few years.
There's one place my plane has sat overnight where the cabin was definitely left open to intruders, and that's when the windshield was being replaced early last summer. That was in a concrete hangar at a rural field. The plane would have sat in there, maybe for days, with no windshield. Were there mice in the hangar? I have no idea, but the crew who worked on my plane spent long hours there and I'm pretty sure I saw food being eaten there....
Not that it helps, I had the inspection plates off a Cub overnight, a mouse got in there and chewed all the rib stitching off. I had looked in there the day before and everything was fine. Can you say wing recover? Yuck!
Dave
Just for clarification: I was asking which is better, Alodine vs ZnCrO4, NOT Alumiprep vs Alodine. I know it's a two-step process. Etch first, then apply protectant. Good to know that Alumiprep won't remove too much.
Again, I'm asking because Cessna recommends Alodine but Tom-D said "zinkcromate" is best. Yes, he can apply Alodine first and then chromate, I'm trying to figure out how you determine whether you need both, and if only one, whether chromate is better than Alodine.
And no, my guy is not an expert in spars. I'm trying to get him all the information I can, and he also has access to Cessna experts at Michigan Aviation in PTK.
You use all three. Alumiprep cleans the oxidation, the Alodine reacts with the new oxidation and the zinc chromate provides a paint type barrier coat between the aluminium and the environment.
Yep, that's the plan now (hopefully). Now if I can just get my mechanic back to work on my plane... he seems to have an endless stream of distractions keeping him from it.
I find this is frequently the case when an aircraft has an ailment the mechanic is not particularly interested in working on.
The part I don't get is that the typical reward (money) is frequently insufficient incentive.
I doubt if this has anything to do with that. It took him over a week to get started on my annual, before anyone suspected this problem. It's a character trait with him: anytime someone has an airplane with a problem, he will drop whatever he's doing to look at it and then chat with the owner for a couple of hours. He's about the nicest guy you've ever met, but he has twice as much work as he needs to keep him occupied, and lots of commitments that have nothing to do with working on planes.I find this is frequently the case when an aircraft has an ailment the mechanic is not particularly interested in working on.
The part I don't get is that the typical reward (money) is frequently insufficient incentive.
Allow me to try to explain. Some jobs we don't like doing for whatever reason. If we don't like doing them, we probably never got real good at doing them so when we do them, it probably takes more time than it should, and more time than we'll bill for. Given this, we end up with a double whammy situation, we're doing a job we don't like doing and we're "losing money" at it. This is quite frequent with sheet metal work.
I find this is frequently the case when an aircraft has an ailment the mechanic is not particularly interested in working on.
The part I don't get is that the typical reward (money) is frequently insufficient incentive.
That's a management problem.
We all have things we don't like to do. If I don't want to do something, I'll bill substantially more for it to discourage the person from asking me to do it. If that person chooses to have me do it anyway, I'll come out enough ahead to make it worthwhile.
I'm a bit more Frank with folks than that, I tell them that I'm not the guy they want, I am not that great at doing this type of work, here is the number for the guy who has the equipment and talent to do it right.
See........... Ya Bye.......
I doubt if this has anything to do with that. It took him over a week to get started on my annual, before anyone suspected this problem. It's a character trait with him: anytime someone has an airplane with a problem, he will drop whatever he's doing to look at it and then chat with the owner for a couple of hours. He's about the nicest guy you've ever met, but he has twice as much work as he needs to keep him occupied, and lots of commitments that have nothing to do with working on planes.
Oh sure, he didn't have the sanding wheel he needed at first, so he ordered it and had to wait until it came in. But then, once it was in, he turned to annual another plane, saying the owner had flown up from Florida.In many case I evaluate the repair and order the supplies to do it, and set the aircraft aside until they arrive. If Lisa is trying to find a new/different carry thru it may take a while, and he is continuing to service his other customers.
Unfortunately the airplane isn't even in any condition right now for a ferry flight. It's still disassembled for annual. He promised to start putting it back together while waiting for the sanding wheel to come it, but of course he never did. The way he works, it would take him a week just to get the airplane flyable.That's different and how most all shorthanded shops operate especially if it's a busy field. It's also why you use specialty shops when you run into specialty problems which is where ferry permits come into play.
Unfortunately the airplane isn't even in any condition right now for a ferry flight. It's still disassembled for annual. He promised to start putting it back together while waiting for the sanding wheel to come it, but of course he never did. The way he works, it would take him a week just to get the airplane flyable.
The club I belong to doesn't use him for annuals and most maintenance because he's so slow. They have their own mechanic, fortunately, but he doesn't know a thing about Cardinals, and charges well over the going A&P rate for non-club planes.
There's the rub, he'll know it's a bluff. He knows there aren't any other mechanics on the field who would tackle the job. Next year I probably should take it somewhere for annual. I just didn't have the time this year to make the arrangements.Of course be ready to hire the A&P just in case he says to go ahead.