SkyDog58
Ejection Handle Pulled
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 14,600
- Location
- My own special place.
- Display Name
Display name:
Canis Non Grata
29 years worth and counting
Thank you.
29 years worth and counting
But self driving cars will be worse, far worse.
I'm not for drunken drivers but a checkpoint violates unlawful search laws. In Dallas a few years back cops were writing people up in a downtown hotel bar for dwi. Their excuse was they were going to drive, even the ones that arrived by taxi from the airport.From living and owning a home in CA, I had my home broken into, police gave zero ****s, wouldn't even dust for prints, even offered the lazy SOB to pay for his powder, later in the same $1M+ neighborhood a few tried to break in while I was home, after seeing my firearm they ran away like vermin, the police showed up later and actually gave me **** about my actions, lake how dare I scare their criminals, guess keeping the low life's around is job security.
Had a few other instances over the years, both where I had stuff stolen and my employer or friends were victims, same lame, here's a report and nada, zero ****s given.
Another small but disappointing instance, someone hit my car in a parking lot, not super bad but it bent the fender in enough I couldn't open my pax door, cop shows up, gives me the useless report, doesn't do jack to find the person, I even asked the local shops a few days later who had cameras looking at the lot if a cop asked for the footage yet, answer was NOPE. And no, this isn't a area they has rapes or murders or anything like that occurring on the daily.
Yet police are always Johnny on the spot to write a ticket for 11mph over or to tailgate people on a weekend after 6p
It's not me, I love a good return on investment for my taxes, I'd love to have my stolen property back, I wish they did what they are advertised to do, sadly for the most part that ain't the case.
At the very least if they are going to do these unamerican roadblocks, they could have the respect to remove the American flag from their uniforms first.
The point is they stopped you without cause. That is illegal.Well, we disagree.
If they are stopping everyone and just having a conversation, what's the violation?
If during that conversation they find probable cause, good for them/us, too bad for you.
DUI or public intox. Such a DUI arrest would not even have probable cause, let alone enough for conviction. Public Intoxication doesn't require you drive, just be sufficiently toasted in a public place (a bar will suffice) that you are a danger to yourself or others.I'm not for drunken drivers but a checkpoint violates unlawful search laws. In Dallas a few years back cops were writing people up in a downtown hotel bar for dwi. Their excuse was they were going to drive, even the ones that arrived by taxi from the airport.
Meh, I'm not trying to belittle anyone, I just don't have patientence or respect for people who violate the constitution or look so hard for trouble they find it even when it isn't there.
They are not trying to convict you unless you are obviously in violation.
True, nowadays police do think they are above the citizens.
I'd bet the average LEO would gladly go for months without issuing any tickets, arresting anyone, responding to any domestic disputes, you name it. Wouldn't it be AWESOME if we all lived in Mayberry and the drunks just walked in, asked for they key, and hit the cot to sleep it off?
Police don't convict. That's for the courts. I'm not even sure they charge you. Their reports are the suspicion of an offense. Then someone else charges an offense, and yet another person (or 12) convict.
I cannot believe it. James is apparently a member of Black Lives Matter. OK, maybe not a member, but he certainly appears to be a sympathizer.
But that said, I will say my experience moving to Norway have really opened my eyes.
I have heard informally that Norwegians drink a crapload more than we do here in North America, at least in the lower 48. Something to do with the long dark winters. I would be happily corrected if mistaken.
There is no "our side". There are the cops, and there are "them."And that’s what I was saying initially. Ideology drives politics and elections, and that’s the problem we really face. Law enforcement is caught in the middle, and are largely on our side. We shouldn’t further alienate them.
Here’s the problem I have with people like James. LE provides the critical role of separating good from evil. That’s just a fact. Look at any of the looting that goes on at the slightest provocation. James is so concerned over his rights, but he wants to take issue with there very people who are protecting them. Sure, some guys take advantage of their position and abuse it. I had a bad run in recently with several cops and it absolutely infuriated me. But that doesn’t change the fact of what LE as a whole is doing for the society. Those guys are the ones dealing with all the thugs and low-life’s that would gladly rob me and leave me dead over a few dollars.
James is worried about a cop checking him out, but he’d have a lot more to be worried about if they weren’t there at all. His house, his car, his plane, his safety and health aren’t a given. The fact that he can own them with peace of mind, isn’t because he such a b@d@ss, no one will mess with them. (Although I get the idea he tells himself that). They are his and he can enjoy them because other people are serving to protect them.
Lastly, he’s taking issue with the wrong people. Many, if not most LEOs, would agree with him about big government. Our rights and freedoms aren’t in jeopardy because of a small minority of bad LEOs. They are in jeopardy because of an ideology that is being broadly swallowed wholesale by an unthinking, soft minded public that has let itself be pitted against itself. He’s looking for victory in a skirmish, and ignoring a rout on the front lines.
Uhh, ok? So your point is what?
You don’t know who I vote for, so your point makes no sense. Unless you are against all voting. Then it would make sense but it would be stupid.
Seriously, try again. What are you disagreeing with?
Evidently we both agree that the problem is with who holds office and who makes the rules. That was my point.
My wife is pregnant. Best DD ever (not the college “who is the least drunk” DD).
Let me get this straight: a recent bad run in with several cops that infuriated you, (be careful, angry citizens get shot first, the peaceful ones get shot right after) and secondly you think cops are here to protect us? Someone needs to get current with Supreme Court rulings. The police are NOT here to protect us. Please become an informed citizen for your own protection, and those whom you love.
I'm sure the show being produced by and narrated by "foreigners" that MAY have a different view of american law enforcement is interesting.
I have heard informally that Norwegians drink a crapload more than we do here in North America, at least in the lower 48. Something to do with the long dark winters. I would be happily corrected if mistaken.
I suspect there are far more options for public transportation in Norway than in most American cities. Indeed, how many Norwegians actually drive vs. their American counterparts?Many do, but few drive in that condition.
and then contain it under some domed structure in a place called DC.If only we could harness the stupidity....
I suspect there are far more options for public transportation in Norway than in most American cities. Indeed, how many Norwegians actually drive vs. their American counterparts?
If only we could harness the stupidity....
When we were in France, they pulled our tour bus over. We'd been out tasting wine all day long so the passengers were by and large hammered, but the officer courteously dealt with us while the checked the driver. Zero tolerance there.
Random check of commercial operator. Don't even need an articulable suspicion in France...no Terry.What was the reason for the stop?
Random check of commercial operator. Don't even need an articulable suspicion in France...no Terry.