But we never seem to use direct flights in these comparisons, either. And the weather is always good enough, the plane never strands us with a mechanical problem, etc.
Why don't people factor in the extra time that they plan on when using the airlines? There are always possibilities in the airlines, too. Mechanical delays, weather, personnel, long security lines...
I do several flights a year direct that I can compare.
BWI-BNA
Airline:
1:30 minute drive to BWI.
I plan to arrive at the parking garage 1:30 before the flight to accomodate high traffic volumes, accidents on the beltway, delays in security, etc...
The airline flight is an easy 2 hour flight.
Deplaning and getting a rental car eats up another 30-45 minutes.
45 minute drive to destination.
Total time: 6-6.5 hours.
GA:
There is no accounting for weather and notams, because they are checked the night before, and a few minutes just before flight and easily equal the amount of time wasted getting ready for the airline flight.
45 minute drive to airport.
15 minute preflight.
~3.5-4.5 hours flight.
15 minute deplane and get rental car that is more often than not waiting on the tarmac for me.
20 minute drive to destination.
6 hours 5 minutes at the highest (strong headwind.)
Timewise it is a wash or slightly better. Hassle-wise, it beats the airlines hands down. Price-wise, the airlines have me beat unless I fill the airplane with passengers.
I end up splitting the trips between airline and Twinkie. Any further than that, and Twinkie starts to lose all battles.
Now the Aerostar is a whole 'nuther ballgame....
![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)