I had no idea Cessna was marketing a Turbo Skyhawk. Who in the world is the market for a turbo that goes < 140 knots with < 800 lbs useful load?
Anybody know what they are asking for it?
Anybody know what they are asking for it?
I guess. Goes a tiny bit faster, a tiny bit cheaper, as long as you use it as a 2 seater. For $65,000 more money. I'm not seeing the market, but there are many bigger things about the aircraft market I don't understand.I thought the point of it is that it's a diesel that's able to run on Jet-A, not so much that it's turbocharged (although the turbodiesel does bring the traditional benefits that go along with turbocharging).
And those markets are looking for a two seat 172?Salty- there are some markets where Avgas is very difficult or impossible to find. And even in the US which is by far the best market for 100LL availability, jet fuel is cheaper.
Very true. I know a couple from South Africa who just completed a round-the-world trip in their RV-10. By very careful research they were able to plan stops where there was avgas, and even then they almost had to have some shipped to them from another location.Salty- there are some markets where Avgas is very difficult or impossible to find.
Yup -- the vast majority of them are being purchased for training fleets anyway.And those markets are looking for a two seat 172?
(although the turbodiesel does bring the traditional benefits that go along with turbocharging).
And those markets are looking for a two seat 172?
Not being a smart ass, but are people actually buying brand new planes to train in?Well, I think it beats a 4 seat paperweight 172 that you can’t fuel. Besides, most 172 missions (especially training) neither need full fuel or full seats.
Not being a smart ass, but are people actually buying brand new planes to train in?
Not being a smart ass, but are people actually buying brand new planes to train in?