No dog in your specific airplane make/model fight, but I'll give ya my personal anecdote. My insurance did not go up this year (low hull value Arrow, 1M policy with per pax caps, but I fly with family only so I'm cool with the limits). To be pedantic, it actually went down 30 bucks.
. I have however heard the complaint this year from my circle of GA acquaintances fwiw.
Friends/Coworkers with a Lance, Cherokee six 260 and V-tail (S35) respectively otoh, did see an increase this year, the V-tail Bo being the highest (400/yr for a guy with no claims). I pried, as they did their brokers. Case for the PA-32s, low-time dumbos keep crashing them (both in motion ground and landing accidents). The Lance guy did re-up his hull 20K, the six 260 guy left it alone. For the Bo, ruddervator's cat is out the bag. Don't shoot the messenger, that's what he told me the agent proferred to him.
To be clear, these dynamics are not unique. The 210 for instance has suffered from this dynamic for the better part of a decade now. As these things continue to get older and the hull support becomes cantankerous (especially the one off high value parts, actuators, pivots, RVs, wing carrythroughs) insurance market will behave accordingly until only those willing to self-insure are the only players of consequence. Textron is wringing its hands, make no mistake. That's not a bug, that's the feature.
If you get a word with the agent, feel free to share back what your experience was, as it can shine a light of the current and perhaps changing dynamics of our little hobby as we move into the second decade of this century. I'm certainly passively indexing these trends one a pre- and post- recession basis, timing my next airplane strike myself.