Rykymus
Line Up and Wait
That is the question.
Moved to McKinney TX area a few months ago. My 98 Archer III is currently tied-down at KTKI. Prior to moving, the plane had spent the last 3 years hangared in CA. I'm not crazy about being on tie-downs here, especially coming into storm season when hail is a greater possibility. (I do like the price, though, which is only $80/mo.) I also haven't enjoyed the additional complications of not being able to fly it because of the cold weather. (Being outside, options to preheat are fairly limited.) What I do like is that it's only about 15 minutes away from the home we are currently renting. (We are still getting to know the greater DFW area, and will be buying sometime this year.) However, the plane spent pretty much all of it's life (prior to me buying it) outside, so it's not like it's paint is wow. (Pretty much average, I'd say.)
Between the cold weather, not being terribly familiar with the area and weather patterns, and just being busy with work and settling in, I haven't been able to fly as often as I'd like. (Went a whole 2 months without going up, which sucked, as I used to fly at least once per week.) I am getting more time to fly now, so I expect to get back to flying at least once every other week.
Thing is, I just got an email from Arlington Airport stating that I was #2 on the list, and a 41ft T-hangar with power is coming available, and they want to know if I'd be interested if the guy ahead of me passes. About this, I am conflicted.
First, Arlington is an hour drive from our current home, and I fear that the driving time will equate to less flying for me. (I should state that I am self-employed and work from home, so I can pretty much fly at whim.) But that drive would definitely make me less likely to fly. However, I've always wanted to have a hangar with electricity, and I very much like the idea of keeping the plane better protected. I also like the idea of being able to dump our storage space and use the back wall of the hangar for storage of the things that don't fit in our rental at the moment. That would offset $220 of the hangar cost, meaning that overall I'd only be paying about $30/mo more than I am right now. I've already changed my insurance coverage and paid the extra $300 due to the plane no-longer being stored in a hangar, but I imagine I'd get that back relatively soon. (And it's not that big a deal anyway.)
So my question (finally) is should I take the hangar or not. The waiting list at TKI is long, and I'm far down it. I'm open to other options, such as sharing a hangar, or even renting something larger than what I need. (The list for larger hangars at TKI is considerably shorter.) I'm seriously worried that the driving time will dissuade me from flying. Then again, the plane would be protected and out of the elements, and even on cold days, the driving time would give me time to preheat the plane. (Using a remote trigger) The driving time would also force me to plan my flights more, and do less "flying on a whim" which I've always felt is a bad way to fly. Another plus, is that (at 41'x30'p"x12') the hangar in question is big enough to hold what I hope to buy next. (A Cessna 310).
I'd appreciate all of your thoughts on this, especially those of you who have to drive far to fly, as I'm very conflicted.
Thanks,
Ryk
Moved to McKinney TX area a few months ago. My 98 Archer III is currently tied-down at KTKI. Prior to moving, the plane had spent the last 3 years hangared in CA. I'm not crazy about being on tie-downs here, especially coming into storm season when hail is a greater possibility. (I do like the price, though, which is only $80/mo.) I also haven't enjoyed the additional complications of not being able to fly it because of the cold weather. (Being outside, options to preheat are fairly limited.) What I do like is that it's only about 15 minutes away from the home we are currently renting. (We are still getting to know the greater DFW area, and will be buying sometime this year.) However, the plane spent pretty much all of it's life (prior to me buying it) outside, so it's not like it's paint is wow. (Pretty much average, I'd say.)
Between the cold weather, not being terribly familiar with the area and weather patterns, and just being busy with work and settling in, I haven't been able to fly as often as I'd like. (Went a whole 2 months without going up, which sucked, as I used to fly at least once per week.) I am getting more time to fly now, so I expect to get back to flying at least once every other week.
Thing is, I just got an email from Arlington Airport stating that I was #2 on the list, and a 41ft T-hangar with power is coming available, and they want to know if I'd be interested if the guy ahead of me passes. About this, I am conflicted.
First, Arlington is an hour drive from our current home, and I fear that the driving time will equate to less flying for me. (I should state that I am self-employed and work from home, so I can pretty much fly at whim.) But that drive would definitely make me less likely to fly. However, I've always wanted to have a hangar with electricity, and I very much like the idea of keeping the plane better protected. I also like the idea of being able to dump our storage space and use the back wall of the hangar for storage of the things that don't fit in our rental at the moment. That would offset $220 of the hangar cost, meaning that overall I'd only be paying about $30/mo more than I am right now. I've already changed my insurance coverage and paid the extra $300 due to the plane no-longer being stored in a hangar, but I imagine I'd get that back relatively soon. (And it's not that big a deal anyway.)
So my question (finally) is should I take the hangar or not. The waiting list at TKI is long, and I'm far down it. I'm open to other options, such as sharing a hangar, or even renting something larger than what I need. (The list for larger hangars at TKI is considerably shorter.) I'm seriously worried that the driving time will dissuade me from flying. Then again, the plane would be protected and out of the elements, and even on cold days, the driving time would give me time to preheat the plane. (Using a remote trigger) The driving time would also force me to plan my flights more, and do less "flying on a whim" which I've always felt is a bad way to fly. Another plus, is that (at 41'x30'p"x12') the hangar in question is big enough to hold what I hope to buy next. (A Cessna 310).
I'd appreciate all of your thoughts on this, especially those of you who have to drive far to fly, as I'm very conflicted.
Thanks,
Ryk