The Straight Dope is taking on Bournoulli vs. Langewiesche:
Dear Straight Dope:
I'm a pilot and I work for an aircraft manufacturing
company. Just like every other pilot and many non-pilots,
I've learned that aircraft fly because of the low
pressure created on the top of an airfoil. However, I'm
not sure that's the whole story. I recently read a book
called Stick and Rudder by Wolfgang Langewiesche, and he
argues that the primary thing that keeps planes in the
air is the downward force created by the wing--that the
aircraft mostly pushes itself into the sky instead of
pulling itself by the top of the wings. I've been
thinking (perhaps too much) that he may be right. Perhaps
lift is created by both effects. Maybe one is stronger
than the other but I think that most people haven't been
told the real story about what keeps an airplane in the
air. It's got to be more than the low pressure on top of
the wing. I want to know the real story. --Bill Rehm
Guest contributor aerodave replies:
You'd think that after a century of powered flight we'd
have this lift thing figured out. Unfortunately, it's not
as clear as we'd like. A lot of half-baked theories
attempt to explain why airplanes fly. All try to take the
mysterious world of aerodynamics and distill it into
something comprehensible to the non-technical
audience--not an easy task. Nearly all of the common
"theories" are misleading at best, and usually flat-out
wrong.
A couple of the ideas you mention provide part of the
answer, but are incomplete in fundamental ways. To hear
some tell it . . .
For more, see:
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mairplanesfly.html