bflynn
Final Approach
if you see it as purchasing or selling a tiny portion of a company based on your faith in that company, your buying a share while someone else is selling a share does not imply anyone is “wrong”, only that they differ in their views of a company’s prospects and how it fits in with their investment strategy. And I still think that an efficient market nullifies any concept of overpriced or underpriced - at any given moment the price of a stock is exactly where it should be, all things considered.
A perfectly efficient market means everyone has the information to know the true value. But any time you’re relying on efficiency, it isn’t reality. Our markets are not that efficient.
What I meant by that is people disagree about the value of a stock. If they didn’t, there could be no commerce because they would agree on the value and either the buyer or seller would not participate. It requires the seller and the buyer to believe they are benefitting from the transaction. For the seller, they think the stock will be worth less in the future, the buyer hopes it will be worth more. They cannot both be right.
Yes, different investors have different goals, but I don’t believe anybody wants to buy an investment and then have it lose value, just like nobody wants to sell an investment if they believe it will go up. There are rare circumstances where both sides can be right or where both sides can be wrong, but they depend on different measures of value.