Skylane81E
Final Approach
Static RPM need not be redline with a fixed pitch prop, in fact I'm not aware of any case where it is.
Static RPM need not be redline with a fixed pitch prop, in fact I'm not aware of any case where it is.
This thread had many of my favorite participants, and I had a question, so I thought I would bump it and add the question: Is maximum static RPM an operating limitation or is it the maximum that can be achieved at full throttle? Example- if an airplane has a maximum static rpm of 2400, and maximum rpm of 2700 is the plane unairworthy if at standard temperature and pressure, no wind and brakes locked, full throttle yields 2450 rpm? If so, what has to be done to restore the airplane to airworthiness? Assume the fixed pitch propeller is the only one authorized for that aircraft. If the plane is in service and a pilot preparing for a short field takeoff in no wind sees an rpm of 2450, can he simply reduce throttle and take off? If maximum static rpm, but not engine redline, is exceeded, what measures, such as inspection, would need to be made to ensure continued airworthiness?
He's asking whether the max static can be legally exceeded. For instance, if the TCDS says "not under 2300, not over 2400," and he gets 2450 in the static condition, is it airworthy?
I'd say not. There's something wrong with the prop, most likely. Not enough HP being absorbed by it, or maybe the tach is overreading.
Redline with a fixed-pitch prop will only be achieved in flight.
Dan
He's asking whether the max static can be legally exceeded. For instance, if the TCDS says "not under 2300, not over 2400," and he gets 2450 in the static condition, is it airworthy?
I'd say not. There's something wrong with the prop, most likely. Not enough HP being absorbed by it, or maybe the tach is overreading.
Redline with a fixed-pitch prop will only be achieved in flight.
Dan
The prop coming off is higher pitch than the TCDS specifies, but the static rpm was in range with the old prop. I was wondering if the new prop might have too little pitch to keep the full throttle static rpm below the maximum, and if so, what happens?Read it again, agreed,
Very cut and dry, if it ain't in the range it ain't airworthy.
Just have to make sure the prop going on to correct the problem is an approved prop
The prop coming off is higher pitch than the TCDS specifies, but the static rpm was in range with the old prop. I was wondering if the new prop might have too little pitch to keep the full throttle static rpm below the maximum, and if so, what happens?
Not backward at all. I am suggesting concern about exceeding the max static rpm because the new prop is lower pitch than what is coming off. If the new pitch were higher then the concern would be the minimum static rpm, which is what most of the thread had been about. I was asking about maximum static rpm, because the conditions are slightly different going from higher pitch to lower. If an engine/prop combination cannot reach minimum static rpm, then nothing you do to the throttle could change that. If the engine/prop combination can exceed max static rpm at full throttle, does reducing the throttle below max static rpm make everything compliant?You got it backwards. Higher pitch = lower RPM, Lower Pitch = Higher RPM
See post 163
Not backward at all. I am suggesting concern about exceeding the max static rpm because the new prop is lower pitch than what is coming off. If the new pitch were higher then the concern would be the minimum static rpm, which is what most of the thread had been about. I was asking about maximum static rpm, because the conditions are slightly different going from higher pitch to lower. If an engine/prop combination cannot reach minimum static rpm, then nothing you do to the throttle could change that. If the engine/prop combination can exceed max static rpm at full throttle, does reducing the throttle below max static rpm make everything compliant?
...If the engine/prop combination can exceed max static rpm at full throttle, does reducing the throttle below max static rpm make everything compliant?
That would have been my thought. Is there a reference for that? I could not find one. Further, what do you do about exceeding maximum static rpm, if the prop is the only one authorized on the TCDS?The answer is NO. Static RPM is WOT.
Good info. What is the source?Tach accuracy
8-95. TACHOMETER INSPECTION.RPM, replace it.
Due to the exceptionally high stresses that may
be generated by particular propeller/engine
combinations at certain engine revolutions per
minute (RPM), many propeller and aircraft
manufacturers have established areas of RPM
restrictions and other restrictions on maximum
RPM for some models. Some RPM limits do
not exceed 3 percent of the maximum RPM
permitted, and a slow-running tachometer can
cause an engine to run past the maximum
RPM limits. Since there are no postmanufacture
accuracy requirements for engine
tachometers, tachometer inaccuracy could lead
to propeller failure, excessive vibration, or unscheduled
maintenance. If the tachometer exceeds
2 percent (plus or minus) of the tested
That would have been my thought. Is there a reference for that? I could not find one. Further, what do you do about exceeding maximum static rpm, if the prop is the only one authorized on the TCDS?
Good info. What is the source?
That would have been my thought. Is there a reference for that? I could not find one. Further, what do you do about exceeding maximum static rpm, if the prop is the only one authorized on the TCDS?
The reference is the TCDS which lists the static rpm range for the aircraft/propeller combination. Static RPM simply means wide open throttle, that is just a given - what else could it possibly mean? If it is a new prop and the tach accuracy is confirmed as well as magneto timing and you're certain you have no tailwind then you've got me stumped.
The reference is the TCDS which lists the static rpm range for the aircraft/propeller combination. Static RPM simply means wide open throttle, that is just a given - what else could it possibly mean? If it is a new prop and the tach accuracy is confirmed as well as magneto timing and you're certain you have no tailwind then you've got me stumped.
Static RPM need not be redline with a fixed pitch prop, in fact I'm not aware of any case where it is.
Nor should static RPM be redline with a constant speed.
Redline with a fixed-pitch prop will only be achieved in flight.
Dan
Then it is mis-rigged.
Not so fast. Maybe your plane is mis-rigged.
Service Manual D991-3-13 Change 1 dated September 1 1974: 177RG (1974-1975) "...average results of the RPM obtained should be within 50 RPM of 2660" RPM Redline per TCDS
Service Manual 123 dated December 1998: M20J "Static RPM may be 50 RPM less than 2700" 2700 RPM Redline per TCDS
Service Manual D206-4-13 Sated March 1 2004 (O470 powered) "...average results of the RPM obtained should be within 50 RPM of of 2570" 2600 Redline per TCDS
Service manual 753-564 dated January 1, 2009: PA-23-250 "... should be against the high RPM fine adjusting screw (4). With the throttle full forward, observe engine RPM which should be 2575 RPM with high RPM properly adjusted." Redline 2575 per TCDS
Hiyup
Nope. See note at bottom of page 102: (directly from the manufacturer)
http://www.mccauley.textron.com/MPC26OWrev1.pdf
NOTE: On static runs, the propeller should prevent the engine RPM from going to redline. This is done to prevent overspeeding and is a design characteristic of the propeller. However, it should be within 100 RPM of red line.
If it hits redline statically it will go over redline on takeoff. Do what you want, but McCauley knows props better than you do.
If it hits redline statically it will go over redline on takeoff. Do what you want, but McCauley knows props better than you do.
If it hits redline statically it will go over redline on takeoff. Do what you want, but McCauley knows props better than you do.
Not if redline is where the governor takes over and holds the speed
I've never seen one that isn't in governing range during static runs
I've never seen one that isn't in governing range during static runs
None are.
None are.
Why is there a maximum static rpm for fixed pitch props? It cannot be for overspeed, because the value is well below redline. It could be because of torque loads on the engine mount but if the remedy were to increase pitch, the torque would increase. It could be to prevent an overload in tension on the engine mount, but the mount has to be fairly sturdy to accommodate g loads in flight, so it does not seem likely that the engine could overload the mount in tension.
If it hits redline statically it will go over redline on takeoff. Do what you want, but McCauley knows props better than you do.