Took my PPSEL checkride today. The first our school has had under the new ACS.
My DPE is well known in the community and been around for AGES. I think it was evident to him in the first hour that I knew my stuff, came super prepared, and had studied hard from the beginning. The upside of the ACS structure is that it was a bit more conversational and allowed him to understand my though process and decision making while also testing my knowledge.
The downside is that the oral portion took 7 HOURS to complete. This was with me nailing every section and not having to take too much time to look stuff up at all. I only missed 4 questions total on the knowledge test so its not like we had to cover a lot of that remedial stuff either.
There are just so many sections and subsections to cover that it is like a marathon. It took so long that we did not even have time to get in the plane and had to discontinue and do the flight portion another day. Super disappointing and disheartening for a student that is dying to finally get his ticket. It was bittersweet to hear the DPE say that I did extremely well but that we would have to discontinue for another day.
My DPE is definitely a stickler for the rules. To his great credit he was super prepared as well, and had everything well organized and laid out. He was not going to cut any corners however, so we went through every section and subsection in the ACS. I can't see how it could be done much faster really, and I'm concerned for some of the other students who are coming up not quite as prepared as I am.
This is really an impediment to new students and GA in general. To those people who say the ACS will not take any longer, they are simply wrong in practice. If you have an ACS checkride coming up be prepared for an all day event or to discontinue at some point and pick up another day. I can only imagine that DPE fees are goingup as a result of the much greater time commitment as well.
Anyone else taken a ride in the last few weeks? What was your experience?
You should chat with the DPE to attend the recent FAA online seminars being done out of OKC on the ACS. He was NOT required to cover "every section and subsection" if you're saying he went over every item in each. That is flat WRONG per FAA OKC.
He's required to cover two questions from each, essentially, and they're supposed to be integrated into scenarios which can cover more than one question at a time. There's also requirements to cover any written test items you missed, as you pointed out.
Here's my summary of the ACS webinar that the OKC folks are giving via FAASTeam to anyone who signs up.
https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/pts-vs-acs.96352/#post-2099031
They appear (judging by my email alerts on safety seminars I might be interested INF) to be doing at least one per week, and the webinar format can handle a boatload of people per each one.
Here's screenshots of the email announcement I received literally an hour ago, which says they can handle up to 1000 people.
If anyone can't find these seminars on the FAASTeam website and would like me to forward you a copy of the email announcement so you can click on the links, send me a PM with your email address and I'll forward it.
If he hasn't attended one, it may help him figure out the intent, which was not to make the checkride longer, but was intended to cover a wider array of items via scenarios. The OKC based FAA presenter in my class was adamant that the list of tasks is NOT intended to be gone through like a Q&A or quiz of each item. A scenario should cover it, like perhaps the old usual thing...
"Plan me a cross-country from here to X."
The act of doing that and reviewing it covers a BUNCH of item codes in the 55 or so sub-sections. The DPE just documents when they create their scenarios what item codes their methodology covers and those items are done.
Feel free to show him my summary, but better yet, just attending one of the seminars online directly will straighten out any misconceptions and he can also ask any questions that it brings up for him and they promise to respond quickly as well as provide contact info for after the presentation if needed. They had a list of questions asked during my seminar turned around and sent back out within a week. Many of those ended up in the FAQ document they provide a link to, also.
Well worth the price of admission.