Toward insurance minimums? Flew safety pilot for a guy in a 182RG a few weeks ago.
I mean, I was technically PIC right?
No, you need a complex endorsement, it takes only a few hrs, the last flight you get the endorsement and that counts as PIC
I wouldn't think you would be PIC as the safety pilot.
My friend who was a U-2 pilot wanted to know if he could fly my plane. I told him the insurance requires 25 hours of retract time and asked if the wheels fall off your plane does that count as retract time.
My friend who was a U-2 pilot wanted to know if he could fly my plane. I told him the insurance requires 25 hours of retract time and asked if the wheels fall off your plane does that count as retract time.
My friend who was a U-2 pilot wanted to know if he could fly my plane. I told him the insurance requires 25 hours of retract time and asked if the wheels fall off your plane does that count as retract time.
My friend who was a U-2 pilot wanted to know if he could fly my plane. I told him the insurance requires 25 hours of retract time and asked if the wheels fall off your plane does that count as retract time.
PIC and saftey pilot can log PIC, PIC in the plane is PIC in the plane, so yeah count the RG time.
As long as buddy is under the hood, or you're on the controls it's PIC in whatever, so let it count for your insurance.
I'm well aware of that. I always act as PIC as safety pilot so I can get the time when they are under the hood. That wasn't the question. :wink2:
Pretty sure 'retract' implies the gear stays with you...
Do ya need an instrument rating to fly through the Class A VFR and cruise at FL650?
Maybe I didn't word it well.
YES you can count the retract time
I'm sure this is a Socratic question.
Of course he knows that Class A is 18,000-60,000 (FL180-FL600) and an IR is required in that airspace. Above that an IR isn't required as it's Class G.
PIC and saftey pilot can log PIC, PIC in the plane is PIC in the plane, so yeah count the RG time.
As long as buddy is under the hood, or you're on the controls it's PIC in whatever, so let it count for your insurance.
Sigh. The safety pilot may or may not be able to log PIC. If the Safety Pilot is legal in all respects to log PIC in that airplane, and it is agreed upon beforehand that the Safety Pilot will assume those responsibilities, then and ONLY then may the Safety Pilot log the time as PIC. And ONLY that time while the other pilot is wearing a view limiting device.
To make a blanket statement that the Safety Pilot may log PIC time is wrong. There are times when the Safety Pilot may NOT log PIC time. If the Safety Pilot does not have the proper endorsements, he may not log PIC. If the Safety Pilot is not current for the particular flight, he may not log PIC.
As long as the conditions are met to do so.
I think this was already covered.
Doesn't hurt to reinforce. Repetition, sometimes, is a good thing.
Endorsements have ZERO bearing on logging of PIC time, only Cat, Class and Type (if rated).
You are able to LOG PIC time if it was agreed that your function was that of a required crew member per the FARs. As a Safety Pilot when the ACTING PIC is under the hood, you are able to log THAT time and that time only.
Huh?
Category, class and type (if required).
If you're rated for ASEL, you're rated for every ASEL under 12,500 unless it's got a turbine.
You log PIC for every moment you spend at the controls of a complex aircraft as long as you have an ASEL certificate.
As a safety pilot, you log PIC as well if you are the acting PIC. You can only do that if you're endorsed for complex, in a complex aircraft. It's unusual for the safety pilot to be acting PIC, but it can happen. I had it happen once when we needed an IFR clearance, and only the right seat was instrument rated.
If the "acting PIC" is under the hood, the safety pilot is therefore not acting PIC, and cannot log PIC. He can log SIC.
Only if you're logging time based upon being the sole manipulator of the controls, which is not the case of the safety pilot.
If the "acting PIC" is under the hood, the safety pilot is therefore not acting PIC, and cannot log PIC. He can log SIC.
There is no SIC in the regs pertaining to SP. Its an outdated term.
(i) Solo.
(ii) Pilot in command.
(iii) Second in command.
(iv) Flight and ground training received from an authorized instructor.
(v) Training received in a flight simulator, flight training device, or aviation training device from an authorized instructor.
Toward insurance minimums? Flew safety pilot for a guy in a 182RG a few weeks ago.
I mean, I was technically PIC right?
I'm sure this is a Socratic question.
Of course he knows that Class A is 18,000-60,000 (FL180-FL600) and an IR is required in that airspace. Above that an IR isn't required as it's Class G.
Instead of making a separate thread, maybe someone can answer my question since it's sort of related.
I've only flown 172s as a private pilot. I flew with a fellow POA member (commercial rated) who rented a complex aircraft. He gave me around 80-90% stick time in both left and right seats on a 5+ hour flight. I'm not endorsed in a complex. Do I log that as dual only?
I just fly for fun, so I don't really care if it's logged or not. Haven't even put it in my book at all. Just curious how it should be categorized if I choose to log it.
The big center wheel goes up. That's gotta count for at least 1/3 of something. :wink2:
No, "61.31(e) additional training required for complex airplanes" says otherwise.
What exactly are you disagreeing with? All 3 of MAKG1's statements above are true if you add the requirements of the first sentence to the second.MAKG1 said:If you're rated for ASEL, you're rated for every ASEL under 12,500 unless it's got a turbine.
You log PIC for every moment you spend at the controls of a complex aircraft as long as you have an ASEL certificate.
As a safety pilot, you log PIC as well if you are the acting PIC. You can only do that if you're endorsed for complex, in a complex aircraft.
No, "61.31(e) additional training required for complex airplanes" says otherwise.
What exactly are you disagreeing with? All 3 of MAKG1's statements above are true if you add the requirements of the first sentence to the second.
No, 2nd statement is wrong, read 61.31(e), must satisfy (1) i and ii .
No, 2nd statement is wrong, read 61.31(e), must satisfy (1) i and ii .
You need to have a better understanding of "acting" vs merely logging PIC. To be the acting PIC, you need the endorsement (and the training unless you're grandfathered). You don't need the endorsement to log PIC as the sole manipulator.