Maybe not the 182's, but the Airvans are used for that a LOT over this way. They've got the gear that can detect pot growing in between rows of corn.
And yes, it's better to be paying $150/hr than $1500/hr. It'd be better yet if we'd just do away with the whole charade so it'd be $0/hr instead.
This whole photography thing, while I'm sure it has some very good uses, seems to be something that'll be put to highly suspect uses in the future too.
Focusing on that, especially with the "transitioning FROM S&R" just doesn't sound right to me.
I hear ya. The laws are written in such a way that (at least right now) no one in a CAP aircraft can observe any humans doing anything without a law-enforcement person aboard. And they have their own rules about what they can look at and for.
No one in CAP is allowed to be "deputized" or anything of the sort -- in fact it's specifically banned in the CAP regulations.
We fly at the request of the Air Force or in some Wings at the request of the State under completely separate funding for those two, and the Air Force isn't interested at all in law-enforcement, really. States, well... that's up to them.
Most law-enforcement agencies are so insular that they don't "trust" a non-law-enforcement flight crew anyway, in most areas of the country.
I think the crux of the matter is that even though CAP has a long and successful history as a SAR group, lots of agencies actually tasked with SAR won't use us even for that role. Sheriff's departments like having their own "flight branch" and since it's generally the Sheriff who authorizes search missions of any sort, they launch their own people.
Typical inter-agency mis-trust and/or poorly coordinated interoperability. CAP is unique in that it can bring air, ground and communications assets to bear all at the same time with crews and ground teams who've already worked with each other (important - try teaching a Sheriff how your grid square system works over the radio so they can drive to a crash site -- but GPS lat/long has mostly fixed that problem since I was doing CAP long before the aircraft had a direct on-board readout of lat/long). How it's not unique, is that like any government or quasi-government agency, they don't always work well together.
The dedication of almost all government agencies to train on FEMA's Incident Command System, means that in larger scale events where more assets are needed than can be found locally, CAP can "plug-in" and do some of the jobs needed. The trend toward Disaster Services seems to be growing.
AFRCC can let a Wing know that there's an ELT going off... but there's just not much of that going on anymore. Whether it's the 121.5/406 debacle that's causing less ELT activations or just pilots making bigger mistakes and destroying the aircraft so completely the ELT doesn't work... I dunno. Colorado Wing was definitely called out to look for the Malibu that went in down in Southern Colorado earlier this year coming up from PHX, and CAP aircraft and crews were utilized... but so were Army Guard units, and USFS assets (snowmobiles), etc.
It seems that CAP has at least caught on to the concept that no event is going to be handled by any single agency anymore -- we're just an "asset" for various things. Those things tend far more toward Emergency Services than law-enforcement. Law-enforcement is "important" enough to society that they have their own air assets -- except in times of Disaster -- and they call in other law-enforcement air operations folks using "Mutual Aid" agreements even then.
CAP typically gets called when there's just a huge need for more eyeballs looking down on things. Floods, Hurricanes, Fires (less on fires... again, wildfire managers have their own Air Wings these days on 24/7 call).
I remember when Radiological Monitoring (think geiger counters here...) was still a specialty track in the CAP Emergency Services tasks. You know... the Russkies would nuke something and we'd have to go flying to see how "hot" it was. There's some great duty for ya...
Here in Colorado, I don't have the numbers and I'm not part of "leadership" for Air Ops, but as a regular ol' member looking at our sortie list, the far and away vast majority of funded flights are Cadet Orientation flights. Almost nothing else (including currency, even in the Airvan) are paid flights, and we're a LUCKY Wing with some of our funding coming from the State.
The State sees a need to keep a trained group of pilots and ground support going for things they want done, so they subsidize maintenance somewhat beyond what CAP National does, around here. That pushes our hourly rate down a bit over say a flight club, but even proficiency flights have to be documented as to exactly what you're doing to maintain that proficiency (there are published numbered suggested flight profiles), released by a Flight Release Officer, uniforms must be worn, lots of pre-requisites and documentation of training must be done -- it's a lot of work.
Folks that think it's a "flight club" usually get sore about a year into it. Emphasis is on crew coordination and specific mission-oriented tasks, etc.
Recently something like 40 pilots showed up for a Mountain Flying ground-school, as one example. That's a lot of pilots who might not otherwise have done any formal Mountain Flight training. In order for them to get full credit for the course, however -- they'll have to go fly in the Mountains with an Instructor Pilot that's rated in CAP. That's on their own dime. (There was at least a formal request done to try to get State money to offset that a little bit, but budgets are tight and ... the answer was no.)
So... I hear ya on the whole "law enforcement" thing but being on the "inside" I see very little of it. If there's Wings that are flying a ton of those "find the evil pot-grower" flights, it very likely might be the STATE government who's paying for that. Hard to say, since the folks involved aren't supposed to be talking about it -- that could put law-enforcement personnel's lives in danger since those innocuous little plants usually do have folks with guns who like to kill the people trying to stop them from growing them...
The law-enforcement angle didn't exist at all when I first joined in the early 90's... but back then there were lots of pilots seemingly crashing airplanes every other month too... so... SAR mission was hot and heavy. I remember both looking for and then reading the NTSB reports on various mountain crashes in my 20's, which gave me a healthy respect for the big rocks.
I can see why National and Wings picked up on being truck drivers for LEOs as a way to keep doing some flying, having qualified folks be the "truck driver" for the MIB's in back... but there's very few qualified folks in our Squadron (and we're big... 90 people) and even less missions of that type these days. Seems like a bit of a "flash in the pan" thing. SAR and Disasters seem to be the bread and butter of the organization, and that's the reason for the "moving away from SAR" comments we have heard from the USAF... in a big disaster you use the big fuel-sucking birds like the helicopters for SAR, plucking people via cables, and you use the cheap aircraft (CAP) to get lots and lots of visual information.
Of course, they also use non-piloted vehicles for such things, but sometimes you need humans to describe it to get a better "feel" for what's going on. In the grand scheme of things, we're a lot cheaper to fly than even a UAV, and we show up relatively self-sufficient as long as there's a way to fuel us and feed us.