Really?

Locked, not deleted

I think
 
Well this time it wasn't me at least!

This time ;)
 
I hope something got removed because if not that’s pathetic.
 
There are times when I'm firmly behind PETA
 
Jim K said:
You can't unload a truckload of bowling balls with a pitchfork.
Click to expand...

What do you call a dog with no legs?

Don't really matter cause he ain't coming when you call ... :fingerwag:
 
It was just locked for review - there should have been a post at the bottom stating as such. That one was my fault.
 
@TCABM beat me to it. Stephen Lynch is great. If you like that, “Grandfather” is also good.
 
Half Fast said:
Posts can be removed without locking the thread, can’t they?
Click to expand...

Moderation (usually) requires more than one voice - a thread is locked if there's fear that the thread will spin further before a decision can be made. There aren't necessarily a lot of us around at any given time, so decisions sometimes take longer than we'd like.
 
You know sometimes I'm annoyed by the no political discussion rule but here in the last month or two and especially the past 48 hours I'm kind of glad there's one place on the internet I can go and hang out without it being a thing.

But free the puppies! Justice for canine kind! No more speciesism!
 
YA RLY | slimborama | Flickr

From the RoC:

Bans and warnings, actual or suspected, shall not be discussed on the forums. Any inquiries or comments regarding bans are to be sent in private messages or via email. A moderator may choose to publicly inform the participants of a forum about bans and warnings if this is in the interest of the forum.

Whining because your pearl clutching thread got locked after your trolling thread got locked is the opposite of the above.
 
I didn't think he was whining, I saw it as just wanting to know what happened to the thread.
 
appeals to "decorum" is often done in bad faith. Just tone-policing by another name, in my lived experienced. tea emoji frog emoji.
 
RyanB said:
I think this could have been addressed a bit more respectfully.
Click to expand...
Nah. His behavior was being justifiably criticized. It wasn't a comment or attack on him personally. It was simply being less subtle that his persistent behavior, for over ten years, of inserting politics into any gap he can find is getting old.
 
Pilots Of America Management said:
YA RLY | slimborama | Flickr

From the RoC:

Bans and warnings, actual or suspected, shall not be discussed on the forums. Any inquiries or comments regarding bans are to be sent in private messages or via email. A moderator may choose to publicly inform the participants of a forum about bans and warnings if this is in the interest of the forum.

Whining because your pearl clutching thread got locked after your trolling thread got locked is the opposite of the above.
Click to expand...
This opposition to transparency is why I'm MIA...there is no hope for this mentality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top