EdFred
Taxi to Parking
Hmmm, I would have said 1,000.
Why? If saying something more than the minimums why not 2000?
Hmmm, I would have said 1,000.
Why? If saying something more than the minimums why not 2000?
They asked how far he was below the clouds.Because the minimums for ABOVE clouds is 1,000 in most instances?
They asked how far he was below the clouds.
That’s ok…you spelled “lol” backwards, too.
I was a Dick for a number of years, but now I'm a Richard.Flying (esp shrinking GA) is a small enough community, I don't get why people are dicks.
I fly IFR flight plans and get vectored around "VFR" traffic several time a year where there is ZERO chance that that traffic could possibly be legal VFR. Mostly this is the case when flying at altitudes in broken to overcast conditions where it is impossible to maintain VFR cloud clearances.
I thought altimeter readings were not affected by the pitot tube.I don’t doubt that’s what was probably happening. But a zero chance that it was legal vfr? Isn’t there more than a zero chance of a pilot failing to adjust the altimeter setting before takeoff, or flying with a bug in the pitot tube, etc?
You’d be amazed what pilots do when their airspeed instrument fails.I thought altimeter readings were not affected by the pitot tube.
If you were reported, they may call you and ask for your version. Most I've heard, the FAA person will say "you were reported so I have to call", but it's always a friendly conversation with no outcome.