This is the third thread about this accident.
http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69232
The parachutist does have the right of way, but I think he should also have some degree of responsibility to try to avoid dropping on runways.The 170 pilot needs to be hung. The parachute has right of way.
What irks me is in florida many of the motorcycles have bright lights on during the day with up graded halogen lights, about runs car drivers off the road.The parachutist does have the right of way, but I think he should also have some degree of responsibility to try to avoid dropping on runways.
Here in Daytona Beach every other car has a sticker that says "Watch out for motorcycles". I have never seen one that asks bikers to watch out for cars. You would think that should be a no-brainer, but apparently it isn't.
Why the sudden (re)interest in this accident from almost 2-1/2 years ago? Something new happen--lawsuits filed settled, someone in jail?
Sadly, almost no forum software makes it readily apparent when very old posts are dredged up. There is a date stamp but it is small, not something most people look at.The post you are quoting of mine is from over two years ago.
John
The post you are quoting of mine is from over two years ago.
John
Sorry, then. I just thought your aim was off. I truly haven't given it a second thought since the post. OK, that is not entirely true, my field has a jump operation and the LZ is in the middle of the pattern for 33, so I do think about it.There were two posts after it from the day before my post, which I called "recent interest." Still wondering why they dug up a thread over two years old to make ho-hum comments about. Had to quote your old one just for a sense of what the thread was about.
There were two posts after it from the day before my post, which I called "recent interest." Still wondering why they dug up a thread over two years old to make ho-hum comments about. Had to quote your old one just for a sense of what the thread was about.