Clark1961
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 17,737
- Display Name
Display name:
Display name:
I DISAGREE!
I don't know why, but it's mandatory... I think.
No it's not!
I DISAGREE!
I don't know why, but it's mandatory... I think.
I have had "captain" on ignore for about a hundred posts. I was abotu to let fly but restrained myself.
Is it safe to unignore, now?
He's actually showing some humility now!
I DISAGREE!...
Sort of like when you get told to be on your best behavior when the guest are over. But below the surface you are still who you really are. Just the outward appearance is whitewashed.
Would you two guys please go get a treadmill!NO, YOU DON'T!
Would you two guys please go get a treadmill!
But do you like 'them' apples???I like apples.
But do you like 'them' apples???
Indeed, a previously unknown equine pigment variation.That's a different kettle of fish.
Sorry for this on-topic post, but latest news from AP is that prosecutors want him held without bond:
"A JetBlue Airways captain charged with disrupting a Las Vegas-bound flight after he left the cockpit screaming about religion and terrorists should remain in federal custody without bond, prosecutors told a judge Monday."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=149850095
This comment sponsored by the non-sequitur department. If you just missed today's episode, tune in again next week when the redundancy department sponsors the re-run.
Sorry for this on-topic post, but latest news from AP is that prosecutors want him held without bond:
"A JetBlue Airways captain charged with disrupting a Las Vegas-bound flight after he left the cockpit screaming about religion and terrorists should remain in federal custody without bond, prosecutors told a judge Monday."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=149850095
I think you mean the Department of Redundancy Department.
Hmm, won't open on my iPad.... Sounds like it's not a brain tumor or any recent medical event.
You should have seen all the crap Jean Luc Picard, Captain of the Starship Enterprise went through. Never mind momentary mental break-downs. He became a freaking Borg at one point! Dang near every week something happened to him that could have cost the Federation an entire Starship if not for the tireless efforts of his crew.
I think they are afraid that if they let him go, he'll grab a couple of beers and hit the slides....Yeah, but he didn't have DHS/TSA to contend with.
As for Captain Osbon, this is starting to get a little surreal. Shackles? Held without bond? I mean, is he really that much of a threat to society?
I'm no shrink, but I think it's pretty darn clear that the Captain was suffering from something at the time of his... difficulties.
Something's not kosher here.
-Rich
I wouldn't want to conclude from the fact that the goverment prevailed at a detention hearing in a 'terrorism case' that there is no underlying medical/psychiatric cause for what happened that day.
'Brief psychotic disorder', 'Brief psychotic disorder with stressors' (DSM 298.8) or some form of intoxication would seem a much more likely explanation for this episode than a brain tumor or other organic disease. It would still mean that he is not criminally responsible for his actions.
When a very similar thing happened on a Air Canada flight in 2008, they put the FO into psych hospital in ireland for 11 days and then shipped him home to Canada without the 'help' of the criminal justice system (despite the fact that one of the flight-attendants suffered a wrist injury during the struggle).
http://www.aaiu.ie/upload/general/11139-0.pdf
I think they are afraid that if they let him go, he'll grab a couple of beers and hit the slides....
As for Captain Osbon, this is starting to get a little surreal. Shackles? Held without bond? I mean, is he really that much of a threat to society?
I'm no shrink, but I think it's pretty darn clear that the Captain was suffering from something at the time of his... difficulties.
Something's not kosher here.
I'm still thinking there's either major disclosure or drug issue involved. People his age don't flip psycho first time without chemical assistance.
Yes and no. The age peak for brief psychotic is in the 40s iirc. Running some body fluids and hair follicles through something more sensitive than the usual screening tests may also yield some interesting answers. Some people don't do well at all with benadryl and reduced cabin pressure, typically those are are passengers though. Withdrawal from beta-blockers has also landed more than one person in a 23hr observation bed.
As for the disclosure issue: They didn't charge him with falsifying his medical application. If that became the issue, they would probably charge him 6 months from now after the FAA refers his case to the prosecutor.
I suspect the results of this are the cause of the extreme level of prosecution.
I doubt it. The criminal complaint is based on his behaviour alone and those detailed tests typically take a while to complete.
Actually, I really hope they botch this and maliciously prosecute an ill man who in the end is found to have an undiagnosed medical condition. It will finally be an effective display of the security theater that is being perpetrated and the very level of fear mongering that is being pushed on us.
As if we don't have enough examples of that already?
is that rain or snow ???
A friend of mine answered that "What do I smell" question once with...
"I don't know... Maybe Bacon?"
It did not go well for him. Haha. They didn't arrest him because there was nothing to arrest him for, but he spent a looooong time sitting there after refusing a vehicle search while they pretended it took a long time to check NCIC to see if he had any priors.
He didn't. He's actually as straight laced as they come, but has been a card-carrying (so to speak) member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and various other online rights groups and is quite paranoid about the already lost battle of online privacy. He hates being interrogated by anyone. His usual response is "none of your business". To anyone.
He wrote some tools to gather info about people from their Facebook and other online accounts and personas years ago before it was "news" that stalkers could utilize such info, (duh!) and ran it against me once because he knew I wouldn't care. He works in IT security.
"Dude! Do you know how many people you're connected with online?!"
"Yeah. A whole crap-ton of pilots."
"Yeah man. It took the tool a couple hours to sift through all of that!"
"Anything interesting?"
"No. They're boring."
(And then the idea hit me to make him paranoid...)
"Oh, so all those pilots covered up the really interesting connections, eh?"
Haha. He figured out I was kidding. I didn't deliver the line well enough.