Zeldman
Touchdown! Greaser!
I second the wig-wags.I'd also recommend wig-wag lights because our eyes are attracted to motion.
I second the wig-wags.I'd also recommend wig-wag lights because our eyes are attracted to motion.
Oddly enough, I had trouble yesterday spotting a non-ADS-B yellow Cub that was passing to my right on a reciprocal heading slightly below. I was surprised that the color was hard to see, against a background of brownish yellow dead grass.Well, I've had two different people nearly hit me while I was flying a bright yellow piper cub - the second time being another piper cub! So I'll have to downvote that.
all that makes good sense...
so I'm now wondering why specifically the USN has stuck with this particular color scheme? they've been using it a long time...
View attachment 137745View attachment 137737View attachment 137738View attachment 137739View attachment 137740View attachment 137741
Also curious why the USAF doesn't seem to care?
View attachment 137744View attachment 137742View attachment 137743
that's a great illustration!Lot of factors here...visibility air-to-air, visibility after crash landing in fields, forests, deserts, snow, etc.....
Big thing, air-to-air wise, is to make the "object" quickly identifiable as an airplane, and thus help other traffic spot you. Here's something I put together a while back. Three basic color schemes of the same airplane, close in, and at a moderate distance with land and sky backgrounds.
Notice how the multicolor Eagle looks visible close-in, but the different colors get muddy at a distance and the plane gets harder to spot. Even the version with just the single wide stripe on the wing suffers at a distance. It breaks up the outline and essentially makes the plane smaller.
Remember that most of the airplanes you see are mostly white. Thus, a white airplane will probably be more quickly recognized than even a red one....which, at any sort of distance, will basically start blending into the background.