For those of us who have yet to fly to airports at high elevations, can someone clear up the procedure for take-off and landing? I have always been taught to keep the mixture full rich during take-off and landing. It makes sense that that would be different at higher elevation airports, but I have never been taught.
Leaning techniques for landing has been beaten to death already in this thread.
For takeoff, the goal is to product best power and maybe, as EdFred said, a little more rich for cooling.
There are essentially two methods. In some cases, an airplane may have a fuel flow gauge and the POH a chart of targets for takeoff fuel flow at various (density) altitudes. In that case, you want that target. In other cases, the technique would be roughly equivalent to what you do at altitude.
In both, for just about every normally-aspirated single I've flown, the technique taught at high elevation flight schools is to do an approximation at run-up power.
- Lean and watch the RPM climb and then drop.
- Enrichen back to the highest RPM.
- Enrichen a little more. 2-3 twists of a vernier mixture control is generally about right.
The "little more" is for two purposes. One is for engine cooling; the other is because you leaned at run-up power and the demands at full power will be greater.
This is still an approximation and subject to verification and any tweaking on the takeoff roll. Some folks will add a static full power runup as a cross-check. I think that's a good idea when you are unfamiliar with either the airplane or the conditions; the technique I described is based on experience flying and teaching in those areas and different aircraft will react differently (for example, a Cutlas generally requires more enrichening than most others). But the overall goal is to get close to any fiddling around during takeoff is minimal or non-existent.