Mnemonic for skipping course reversal

poadeleted20

Deleted
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
31,250
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Suggestions?
 
For many it's reduced to ATE. :rofl:

But it's a super secret. You can't know without paying $$$$$ to find out.
I guess you'll be waiting a long time for your payment. :D

Someone will not be able to resist posting what it is though...
 
Oh, not me!

Ron once said that he couldn't divulge the meaning because it was copyrighted.

Hint...go over to the red board, he gave it away in a duplicate post.

And I was serious when I said many are just ATE. Acually almost no one is AV1ATE.

It's a pretty dumb mnemonic. You'll be really disappointed.
 
Last edited:
Hint...go over to the red board, he gave it away in a duplicate post.
Haha, I didn't even think that would work since I've never gotten a login for the Red Board, but you can read the messages if you are logged into the AOPA site.

Now I know the secret too, and it only cost me... my AOPA membership fee. :rofl:
 
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Suggestions?

SHARP-T is the one I was taught.

Straight in
Holding
Arc
Radar Vectors
Procedure Turn NA
Timed Approach
 
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Suggestions?

CleaN FiFi ?

This one is hard.
 
Oh, not me!

Ron once said that he couldn't divulge the meaning because it was copyrighted.

Hint...go over to the red board, he gave it away in a duplicate post.

And I was serious when I said many are just ATE. Acually almost no one is AV1ATE.

It's a pretty dumb mnemonic. You'll be really disappointed.

Ron hasn't studied copyright law and the 'fair use' clauses.
 
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • And you mean "when a course reversal is required" to get aligned on final, right?
    No, I don't think you''re looking for that mnomic, you want. one of those roasted tomatoes memory lists that promote robotic rote thinking.
    Robotic rote reaction is (can be) a very good teaching (learning) experience, when coupled with application and correlation of the subject. But never as the sole level of learning.
 
:rofl: I know ARROW but I've never even heard of AV1ATE.
Required aircraft inspections:
Annual (12 months)
VOR check (30 days, IFR only)
100-hour (flight school/passengers for hire)
Altimeter/static (24 months, IFR only)
Transponder (24 months)
ELT - battery expiration and ops check (12 months)
 
Sigh. Just what we need. ANOTHER one.
Considering this is something pilots must know from memory and don't have time to look up in the FAR/AIM if the question arises, and both the posts on aviation web boards and my experience giving IFR refresher training tells me many pilots don't know it, I think maybe some sort of memory aid is in order. We certainly throw around plenty that do not have that imperative.
 
SHARP-T is the one I was taught.

Straight in
Holding
Arc
Radar Vectors
Procedure Turn NA
Timed Approach
You can use that, although an arc is not automatically a course reversal canceller (they'll be marked NoPT if they are), and if it says "Procedure Turn NA," there's no course reversal to skip. Also, a timed approach falls under the Holding.
 
And you mean "when a course reversal is required" to get aligned on final, right?
No, I do not. If it's published, you fly it unless one of the four conditions apply, and "not required to get aligned on final" is not one of those conditions.
 
You don't need a mnemonic--it's like pornograghy, you know it when you see it. I never knew the five Ts either, or was it four? Those Ts just Trip me up.

dtuuri
 
You don't need a mnemonic--it's like pornograghy, you know it when you see it. I never knew the five Ts either, or was it four? Those Ts just Trip me up.

dtuuri

I'm with you, I'm not a mnemonic fan, I spend more time sifting through and remembering the mnemonics than remembering the requirements.
 
Prove that or withdraw your post.

It was at least three years ago Ron. You used the term and I PM'ed you to asked the meaning. You responded that you couldn't divulge because it was copyrighted by P.I.C. (or whoever it is you work(ed) for).

I don't save three year old PM's.

But I guess my question would be, is it indeed copyrighted by P.I.C.? (or whoever it is you work(ed) for). If so, then how could I possibly know this if the above exchange hadn't occurred?

If it's not trademarked by P.I.C. (or whoever it is you work(ed) for) then I apologize for mis-remembering.

To your credit, I do see where you've shared the meaning on occasion on this board over the years.
 
It was at least three years ago Ron. You used the term and I PM'ed you to asked the meaning. You responded that you couldn't divulge because it was copyrighted by P.I.C. (or whoever it is you work(ed) for).
You do not have your facts straight. Find the PM or stop claiming that.
 
maybe you missed it Ron. I asked a question.

But I guess my question would be, is it indeed copyrighted by P.I.C.? (or whoever it is you work(ed) for). If so, then how could I possibly know this if the above exchange hadn't occurred?

Or maybe you conveniently ignored it,
 
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Suggestions?

Yes, just remember:

  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Simple. :rolleyes:
 
Or maybe it was this:

Ron Levy said:
Not without violating copyright law and/or my contract with PIC, unless you want to call PIC and hire me to teach you

Sorry for misremembering.
 
It seems we're always going over the rules for when you're allowed to skip a published course reversal on a SIAP. It should not be harder to learn than ARROW for aircraft documents and AV1ATE for aircraft inspections, and both much easier and more important that roasted tomatoes or whatever that one is. Perhaps we just need to invent a good mnemonic for this:
  • Vectors to final.
  • Holding at the fix.
  • NoPT route.
  • Cleared "straight in".
Suggestions?

Victor Had No Chance.
 
The one I use for this, as well as many other similar situations, is WIDAC.

When In Doubt Ask Controller.

Not only works really well but seems to be appreciated on both sides. Rarely needed in busy airspace when you don't want to contribute to frequency congestion.
 
Or maybe it was this:



Sorry for misremembering.
I don't think that had anything to do with the AV1ATE acronym, since that's not something PIC invented, printed, published, or copyrighted. And I don't see any link there to a post I made. Is that something of your own invention which you just made appear to be a quote from a post I made? Like this bogus example:
timwinters said:
I'm sorry, Ron -- I was wrong about you having said that.
Quotation directly above is false, and never posted by Tim Winters -- just an example of how one can make something appear to be a quote from a post from someone else.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top