He should really try gliding as mentioned above. Might like it.
Heck, a motor glider is basically just an airplane with a very high glade ratio. Well worth looking at.
He should really try gliding as mentioned above. Might like it.
See, he's got an antidepressive too and that's not a "throw my meds away and I'm healed" kinda deal....Bruce he has been denied for any type of medical. He's really not a bad person, but you're probably correct in that he's used to getting his way. Last I heard from him he said he's off the medication and might try after 90 days again. I think it's over but can't fault him for being desperate enough to keep trying.
I believe Martha Stewart was a criminal case from the beginning. Isn’t an FAA enforcement action regulatory? If so, you can fight it as an administrative action (civil) and o the appellate court if needed. Fairly different procedures and downside risks.
Nonetheless, he should definitely be getting expert advice on the medical aspects rather than winging it.
don't we all have mild ADD? wait no, we have OCD
See, he's got an antidepressive too and that's not a "throw my meds away and I'm healed" kinda deal....
I think it all depends on what ‘health professionals’ we’ve visited over the years. Some have their ‘pet diagnosis’, parental steering influences also.
Oh the good ole days, when a young boy could have a bit of energy to burn off, without having to be put on meds.
And that’s just the possible regulatory violation. It doesn’t address the medical denial at all. That’s not an appealable thing AFAIK.
I think there must be some type of appeal, because remember John King ended up in front of the NTSB on his medical and that is the organization which handles the FAA regulatory cases ultimately.
I still wonder what happened between the time I was a kid and today that caused ADD, ADHD, etc, etc to go from pretty much nonexistent to near epidemic proportions.
I still wonder what happened between the time I was a kid and today that caused ADD, ADHD, etc, etc to go from pretty much nonexistent to near epidemic proportions.
Drug money.
I think that was more an "effect" than a cause.
Yes there is an appeal process, but if you recall the details of King's case, it's pretty strong evidence that winning the appeal is nearly impossible. And King had at least two doctors on his side, but they still denied him once (or was it twice?) before grudgingly approving him for 2-pilot ops.I think there must be some type of appeal, because remember John King ended up in front of the NTSB on his medical and that is the organization which handles the FAA regulatory cases ultimately.
Title 9. The previous admin decided that every school dist. Would recieve $6k per kid per year for special needs. Thus, the districts find ADD “profitable”I still wonder what happened between the time I was a kid and today that caused ADD, ADHD, etc, etc to go from pretty much nonexistent to near epidemic proportions.
Interesting. It sounds like that would preclude Part 103 ops as well. Is this new wording or has it always been this way (denial letters)?Not really. The denial letter (certified return receipt) will include a sentence that he is not qualified to operate ANY sort of aircraft, and so he will have reason to know (61.53).
Then if he operates it's between he and the courts.
The overdiagnosis of ADD way predates Obama. And frankly, the statement is laughable, if you spent any time dealing with "exceptional students." Title IX funds are just a feather in the wind.Title 9. The previous admin decided that every school dist. Would recieve $6k per kid per year for special needs. Thus, the districts find ADD “profitable”
I still wonder what happened between the time I was a kid and today that caused ADD, ADHD, etc, etc to go from pretty much nonexistent to near epidemic proportions.
Apparently it is not the drug, but diagnosis it implies. He will need to prove he doesn’t have ADD by reversing the diagnosis. Dr. Bruce is probably his best bet.
Trial-and-error diagnosis that saves time, coupled with drug companies pushing product and parents DEMANDING pills, have turned some docs into Pez dispensers. And if the pills cause a side effect? Many will then prescribe more pills rather than take the time to properly diagnose & try alternate medications that might not have the same toxicity. And some of that is driven by the insurance carriers and regulations. IMHO, the whole industry needs be reinvented. Not going to happen because the sheer amount of $$$ at play.I still wonder what happened between the time I was a kid and today that caused ADD, ADHD, etc, etc to go from pretty much nonexistent to near epidemic proportions.
It means that the FAA considers the prescription was issued for one valid reason only and therefore implies an underlying diagnosis made by the issuing physician and no, that diagnosis isn't having too much appetite. I suppose you could go back to the issuing physician and somehow convince them to tell the FAA that they issued the prescription for a non-sanctioned use. I am sure they will cooperate.If it’s not the drug but the diagnosis, does that mean I can take adderall or Ritalin as an appetite suppressant??
Yup. Years ago my son (80s) was given a scrip for Ritalin and I told the Dr no way was my son going on that, and gave him the scrip back right there. It's too automatic as you implied sourdough.
Dude, I knew you were old, but you've got a son who was in his 80s several years ago? Wow!!!
Yep. Notice things are becoming "spectrum disorders" all of the sudden? "Spectrum disorder" = more diagnoses = more "patients" = more drugs = more money. I was on the common cold spectrum this winter.Either one is basically a BS diagnosis or at least highly subjective. Every behavior is a diagnosis waiting to happen with a drug ready to be prescribed.
Well, Autism is a spectrum disorder because the overall definition is broad. I've not heard any serious (medical research) attempt to make ADD/ADHD into a spectrum of disorders.