Whether their injuries were severe enough to meet your threshold or not, don't you think Delta should take responsibility for dumping fuel on them?Surprised it took so long. Everyone looking for a quick buck. Those rashes must have been really traumatizing...
Whether their injuries were severe enough to meet your threshold or not, don't you think Delta should take responsibility for dumping fuel on them?
Maybe so, when I get back to the line next spring I'll be either SLC or SEA based (moving to Boise after I retire). Enjoy DAL!Yea I’m going to take it easy the first year then see what happens. Thanks man! I’m sure I’ll run into you in NYC at some point.
And Delta could have announced the day after the incident that it would have paid for all of that and thrown in another couple grand. It didn't. Delta's known since the minute this happened that it would have to pay. This is how the system works.Delta owes them money for new outfits, shoes, some soap, and maybe a bit of compensation for everyone's time getting everything cleaned up. Also an apology. They don't owe anyone thousands of dollars which we all know is where this is headed.
VASAviation:
Emergency well handled. No rush, all checklists completed and Kudos to pilots and controllers!!
Except that every attorney in world would tell Delta not to do that since it would effectively be an admission of wrongdoing and make it impossible to defend against all subsequent lawsuits.And Delta could have announced the day after the incident that it would have paid for all of that and thrown in another couple grand. It didn't. Delta's known since the minute this happened that it would have to pay. This is how the system works.
Their insurance company might take a dim view of it for the same reason.Except that every attorney in world would tell Delta not to do that since it would effectively be an admission of wrongdoing and make it impossible to defend against all subsequent lawsuits.
It's how the game is played.
In most jurisdictions, offers of settlement and evidence of subsequent repair are inadmissible in claims for damages, in order to encourage pre-trial settlements and making things safer after an accident.Except that every attorney in world would tell Delta not to do that since it would effectively be an admission of wrongdoing and make it impossible to defend against all subsequent lawsuits.
It's how the game is played.
Their insurance company might take a dim view of it for the same reason.