I have it in my sig and on my company instructor bio, as do other instructors with whom I currently work or have worked in the past. I support the idea of instructors striving to become gold seal instructors. It's like any other achievement-based credential in other professions. If you need a lawyer, doctor, A&P mechanic, dentist, lawn guy, veterinarian, etc. you want a professional who is known for good work. One way -- with emphasis on
one -- you can identify CFIs who do generally good work is by looking for gold seal instructors.
All the gold seal does is provide recognition of a CFI's first-time checkride pass rate. If you have the choice between a CFI who achieves 80% or 20%, you should probably go with the guy who has 80%. If you're a good instructor who teaches a decent number of people each year, earning a gold seal rating is part of the course of normal business for you. If you're a part-timer who doesn't meet the 24 calendar month threshold of 10 checkride signoffs, 8 of whom pass on their first checkride attempt, then you don't get a gold seal. That doesn't mean the part-timer is a bad instructor.
Likewise there is nothing wrong with an instructor including a gold seal on his credentials. It implies nothing about his personality or character. Gold seal instructors are not monolithic groups of instructors who see themselves in any special way. They have simply earned an FAA credential, done the paperwork to get it, and now have it.
Arguments I've seen in PoA against gold seal instructors:
- He taught at a pilot mill and sent all his students to in-house or mill-friendly DPEs.
Happens. Not applicable to the majority.
- He is buddies with one DPE who always passes their students.
See #1.
- I flew with one who was a *rick and had 20% of the total time I had.
See #1.