I feel the need, the need for speed

If you're looking for something more productive to do besides find internet stored trivia, I have some sand granules that need counting :) :D
 
If you're able to actually count them as they go by at that velocity, you have better visual acuity than I ever gave you credit for in the past.
 
Isn't the web site henning is hanging out on answering and solving all of the worlds problems?
 
Don't be silly. The fastest object on Earth is Chuck Norris' fist.
 
Would you count photon as an "object"? Or how do you define an object to begin with?

Also, "speed" is already qualified. Now you just need to quantify it with "high" or "low" (for example). Using "fast" is not only dumb and retarded, it is also redundant and highly irritating. So cut it out. You don't want to make us CDO folks mad. :D
 
bullwinkle said:
Don't be silly. The fastest object on Earth is Chuck Norris' fist.
Click to expand...


^^^^This should be the correct answer but...... The fastest thing on earth was the amount of time it took my ex-wife to go from normal to bitchy! :yikes:
 
I just heard the other day that the fastest manmade object ever witnessed on planet Earth was a manhole cover.

Manmade because we don't want to get into photons or subatomic particles or the like.

Edit - I obviously did not bother to click the link in the OP before responding.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's time to resurrect the conveyor belt.
 
I truly believe it's a neutrino. I thought it might be a photon, which is slight faster, but indeed a photon has no mass so cannot be considered an object.
 
Kritchlow said:
I truly believe it's a neutrino. I thought it might be a photon, which is slight faster, but indeed a photon has no mass so cannot be considered an object.
Click to expand...

Photon can be considered a particle with certain minimal mass so yes, we could call it an object.

But I still like the answer with "Chuck Norris' fist" the best. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top