docmirror
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 12,008
- Display Name
Display name:
Cowboy - yeehah!
Where were you lurking and stalking me??!
You may be paranoid, but that doesn't mean I'm not after you!
Where were you lurking and stalking me??!
Ectually, there are several planes that are as good as the RV. No disrespect intended to the fervent flock. It is a fine plane, but not the be-all, end-all of GA aircraft.
...I flew my plane on Monday, and it felt like I was trying to coax a freighter into port, by comparison....
You may be paranoid, but that doesn't mean I'm not after you!
That explains all those thousands of flying RV's!Lifecycle of the RV convert:
Have a ride or two. Get 'converted'. Go to a few EAA mtgs. Visit with other builders and owners. Order the DVD from Vans. Order the tail kit. Start building. Order the next kit. Nearly finish the tail kit. Get distracted with flying. Push tail kit in corner. Unpack next kit, and stare at all the bits. Go fly something. Get the tail kit back out and look at all those clecos. Put it back in the corner. Wait two years. Take pics of tail kit and next boxes of bits. Put it on Barnstormers, advertising it as '80% completed, only needs a few details to fly!' Sell for a few bucks, and buy a Cherokee.
That explains all those thousands of flying RV's!
That explains all those thousands of flying RV's!
I like them, too....even hold a world speed record in one. But glass construction isn't for everyone. I know some guys that developed some significant health issues. At least with the RV you just need big boxes of band-aids!
Well, if you count tail kit sales to RVs flying you might find he's not too far off the mark! I'd guess its at least 2:1!
I heard at the meeting last night that RVs are made out of aluminum because of all of the beer cans generated by the building process. True?
Absolutely!
Ever time you recycle a can an RV is born.
You have to wonder how many of the unfinished aircraft are under construction? Start/completion numbers are a tough metric because there are 3 year projects and there are 20 year projects. They all look and fly the same once they are finished...
Well, maybe every 50 cases...
I have been a pilot for almost 20 years, flying the usual assortment of single engined spam cans. I've owned Pipers and an Ercoupe, and flown rental Cessnas. I've got hours in a fairly wide variety of aircraft, from Cubs to Constellations.
But, oh, my goodness, I've never flown anything like the RV-8 I flew Sunday.
It is amazing what good engineering can produce. The controls are wonderfully harmonized and precise. Stability is comparable to a lawn dart -- point it "thataway" and it goes thataway, without wallow or wander.
Performance? Um, nothing comes close, per horsepower. We saw 200 mph with a 180 HP engine, and did a zoom climb at over 5000 feet per minute.
Want to do a roll? Why not? Want to carry folding chairs, a cooler, and two bags of clothes? It will do it.
Visibility? Unlimited. Comfort? I had more shoulder room than when I fly with another guy in my Pathfinder.
I believe Vans has designed the perfect single engine prop plane. I flew my plane on Monday, and it felt like I was trying to coax a freighter into port, by comparison.
I have been...converted. I now understand Geico's religious fervor.
I think Sonex has a good completion rate, comparable to Van's.
Tandem seating....Not me. I usually have eye candy in the adjacent seat.
When is somebody going to design a two seat, side by side, aluminum and retractable speedster airplane kit? Basically a Glasair, or Lancair 360 made of aluminum. Why can't I have this? Why does it have to be pain in the ass fiberglass?
I want a modern, two seat Mooney basically. Nobody sees fit to build it though.
I want a modern, two seat Mooney basically. Nobody sees fit to build it though.
How about (former Questar) Venture Model 20? Seems like exact match.I want a modern, two seat Mooney basically. Nobody sees fit to build it though.
Did you do an overhead break?
Why on Earth would an RV6 need retractable gear?
Lifecycle of the RV convert:
Have a ride or two. Get 'converted'. Go to a few EAA mtgs. Visit with other builders and owners. Order the DVD from Vans. Order the tail kit. Start building. Order the next kit. Nearly finish the tail kit. Get distracted with flying. Push tail kit in corner. Unpack next kit, and stare at all the bits. Go fly something. Get the tail kit back out and look at all those clecos. Put it back in the corner. Wait two years. Take pics of tail kit and next boxes of bits. Put it on Barnstormers, advertising it as '80% completed, only needs a few details to fly!' Sell for a few bucks, and buy a Cherokee.
Thanks Jay!
Wait until you hang out with RV aviators for a few years.
How about a experimental Mooney with the spacious Beechcraft Sundowner cockpit and an Ercoupe spin proof tail? Now THAT would be something to see....
Why on Earth would an RV6 need retractable gear?
Key word being "experimental." Not "kit"! You can build anything you can imagine (subject to the laws of physics). Just ask Burt Rutan!
Because flying around with fixed gear is just plain embarrassing.
I like them, too....even hold a world speed record in one. But glass construction isn't for everyone. I know some guys that developed some significant health issues. At least with the RV you just need big boxes of band-aids!
I like them, too....even hold a world speed record in one. But glass construction isn't for everyone. I know some guys that developed some significant health issues. At least with the RV you just need big boxes of band-aids!
This is how you are supposed to build it. My father built a Seawind.
I applaud Van for the number of completions. It's my understanding that of the non-UL types the RVs have the best completion percent out there.
According to one of their periodic reports, the seller of the Arion Lightning kit reports better than 50% completion rates and fairly rapid build times. It is definitely not an UL. According to the following newsletter between March '06 and June '09 they had delivered 78 kits and 42 were flying, giving a completion rate of about 54% and a build time for those 42 all under 3 years. (I think there are now over 150 flying.) Build time is given as roughly 600 hours.
http://www.flylightning.net/images/pdf/Newsletter%202-6%20Jun%2009.pdf
This is how you are supposed to build it. My father built a Seawind.
Why on Earth would an RV6 need retractable gear?