Why do they (does he) always announce his last post under a specific id?
Personal insecurities and general lack of self confidence and self worth. Not worth anything more than a bit of pity.
Why do they (does he) always announce his last post under a specific id?
I've never met a Vince I liked.
Given the reputation of this board, I've been thinking about why it's taken 7+ pages for this thread to finally break down. POA definitely has more than its fair share of pedants, or guys that seem to love nothing more than to post merely as a vehicle to point out their extensive knowledge and experience. I roll my eyes just as much as the next guy when this happens.
But at the same time, 10,000+ hours (for example), even when applied to a blowhard, is still 10,000+ hours. If you've got a lot of time in the cockpit of an airplane, whether it's GA, military, airline, or whatever - you've almost undoubtably done some s**t that's shaken up some of your earlier preconceived ideas about what will never happen to you. And after awhile, you learn to know better than to give a ration of crap to someone that just accomplished one of those things in the 'never' category. Especially when that person owns up to it and doesn't make excuses, as Henning did.
Not accurate. While the bar is quite low, it does exist and isn't for "ANY reason". It has to relate to your competency as a pilot and there has to be a specific reason to suggest it is in question.
At any time does not mean after any particular action, statement, or lack of action has taken place.Reinspection and Reexamination.— The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may reinspect at any time a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, design organization, production certificate holder, air navigation facility, or air agency, or reexamine an airman holding a certificate issued under section 44703 of this title.
So, under what circumstances do you claim a 44709 ride cannot take place?
Win Kinner was the most high time CFI I knew and began flying before WWII. In the early 90s he flew into the side of a mountain down in Cabo.
That's the second time in the thread the OP is accused of insurance fraud. Damn this board is getting sideways.
That's the second time in the thread the OP is accused of insurance fraud. Damn this board is getting sideways.
Don't cry for Henning. He is laughing all the way to the bank. How long has his plane been for sale? Two years? Almost suspicious...
Yep, notice that is someone that doesn't have the balls to come out in the open. Takes all kinds.
He wasn't even so circumspect over on Kim's board.
You display all the signs of "short man's complex".
If you were my kid who got in trouble with his driver's license I'd be driving you to the family attorney on Monday morning to try and do some damage control. I hope things work out for you.
What's the bigger lesson: teaching a kid what they did was wrong and to accept the punishment or teaching them that they are above the law because daddy's lawyer will get them off?
I have no problem with how Henning handled this. I would of done the same.
What's the bigger lesson: teaching a kid what they did was wrong and to accept the punishment or teaching them that they are above the law because daddy's lawyer will get them off?
I have no problem with how Henning handled this. I would of done the same.
That's the second time in the thread the OP is accused of insurance fraud. Damn this board is getting sideways.
About 5 pages ago before I posted anything else I was going to post that Vince and Jeff k were the same person and that he was fake communicating with himself in some posts and now it looks like that was confirmed on the purple board!
No... sorry to burst your bubble "unregistered" but I don't need to hide behind a fake name and Vince isn't me , but yes I'm Tucker on the purple board. When Henning started running his mouth about lawsuits I ID'ed myself to him so he could serve me the lawsuit without bothering the moderator.
BTW, notice my avatar?
Nice job post incident and nice job ignoring and/of fending off the two PoA a*holes.
Boy. If that's not the pot calling the kettle black
As I said, unless you post as Rotor & Wing, I was not addressing you.
To the best of my recollection you have not insulated I was committing insurance fraud.
And as I said, if you meant Rotor & Wing, then that is who you should have addressed instead of everyone vaguely in that thread.
That's because I didn't.
Well, since I specifically stated that it concerned those accusing me of fraud, if you didn't accuse me of fraud, why would you feel it applied to you?
Because you knew exactly who you were addressing (one party) when you wrote that but chose to be vague and applied it to the group. Don't act all confused. Let's walk away from this now OK?
Wow this community is kinda mean
I'm not confused, you are. I made a general warning to give something to consider for people ready to jump on that band wagon.
I believe one of the other posters had an incident as we'll taking off on tip tanks if I recall.
Let me know how it goes on that insurance claim though. It is factual that you got that policy the same day as the accident? My claim on the policy I had held 3 years took 6 weeks before it paid out $85K....
That would be me.
Is there an exclusion period on aircraft insurance?
Yeah... that's got to be it.
Let me know how it goes on that insurance claim though. It is factual that you got that policy the same day as the accident? My claim on the policy I had held 3 years took 6 weeks before it paid out $85K... like to compare notes once you get to a payoff.
Did you mean after you bind the policy (not in my experience) .