Tantalum
Final Approach
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 9,250
- Display Name
Display name:
San_Diego_Pilot
The other thread got me thinking how often do people (and I don't mean that OP, who I think did great, but the general pilot population) actually practice emergencies?
It is very easy to get a little (or very) tunnel-visioned when dealing with an emergency, or even just an unfamiliar scenario... we see it all the time in accident write ups and we see it in each other when reading posts
Back when I was in training, on any given flight my instructor would hit me with at least 2-3 diffferent emergencies or scenarios... at the time I hated this as I felt like it added an unnecessary additional workload to the training exercises, but his point was it wasn't a matter of "if" it was "when" I would have an issue and the more routine it is the less likely you are to freeze up. They were unannounced as well... everything from engine failures and mock approaches to fields, to locking the controls (where trim has reverse inputs) to lost controls (where trim works the way it should) to blocking instruments, etc.
...that was 10-15 years ago
Since then the most I've had in the way of inflight emergencies during my BFRs or rental club checkouts was the standard engine failure simulation coincidentally over a beautiful big runway. Or in the Cirrus transition the response to pretty much any issue was to pull the chute. In fact, in some checkouts once I did the checklist and established best glide then "poof the power came back" and we would do a standard landing
Did the training culture change? Or did I just have a hard ass CFI?
It is very easy to get a little (or very) tunnel-visioned when dealing with an emergency, or even just an unfamiliar scenario... we see it all the time in accident write ups and we see it in each other when reading posts
Back when I was in training, on any given flight my instructor would hit me with at least 2-3 diffferent emergencies or scenarios... at the time I hated this as I felt like it added an unnecessary additional workload to the training exercises, but his point was it wasn't a matter of "if" it was "when" I would have an issue and the more routine it is the less likely you are to freeze up. They were unannounced as well... everything from engine failures and mock approaches to fields, to locking the controls (where trim has reverse inputs) to lost controls (where trim works the way it should) to blocking instruments, etc.
...that was 10-15 years ago
Since then the most I've had in the way of inflight emergencies during my BFRs or rental club checkouts was the standard engine failure simulation coincidentally over a beautiful big runway. Or in the Cirrus transition the response to pretty much any issue was to pull the chute. In fact, in some checkouts once I did the checklist and established best glide then "poof the power came back" and we would do a standard landing
Did the training culture change? Or did I just have a hard ass CFI?