Ed Haywood
En-Route
Power off 180 is very much real life. Ask me how I know.Like the power off 180 and chandelle, the 200 ft landing thing is a test requirment, not real life.
Power off 180 is very much real life. Ask me how I know.Like the power off 180 and chandelle, the 200 ft landing thing is a test requirment, not real life.
And not being able to touch down where you want to is the primary method that airplanes are destroyed in my corner of aviation.Power off 180 is very much real life. Ask me how I know.
If you understand ground effect, the closer the wing to the surface, the less induced drag the aircraft has. If you fly the plane correctly, the high wing vs the low wing is less prone to float not more prone to float.Care to explain?
A power off 180 in the test the engine is fully functional, you are never in real danger aka can go around.Power off 180 is very much real life. Ask me how I know.
This, precisely. The bolded sums up the entire thread.If you understand ground effect, the closer the wing to the surface, the less induced drag the aircraft has. If you fly the plane correctly, the high wing vs the low wing is less prone to float not more prone to float.
Float during a landing is a product of excessive energy. The energy can be airspeed, altitude or both.
Bad decisions are a bigger part of accidents than you will admit. Remember the holes in the swiss cheese only line up because poor decisions made them. I'll tell you now that if the runway is obstructed, or length is an issue, I am NOT going to depend on my accuracy... to many things can go wrong.. a gust, a thermal, an animal, another aircraft etc etc etc.And not being able to touch down where you want to is the primary method that airplanes are destroyed in my corner of aviation.
...but the point of doing it is to force you to learn the energy relationship so that you become more consistent and controlled in your approach and landing.
So how much do you add to the book landing distance before you land on a runway?Bad decisions are a bigger part of accidents than you will admit. Remember the holes in the swiss cheese only line up because poor decisions made them. I'll tell you now that if the runway is obstructed, or length is an issue, I am NOT going to depend on my accuracy... to many things can go wrong.. a gust, a thermal, an animal, another aircraft etc etc etc.
Of course the interwebsis full of Bob Hoover wannabe's.... I'm not one of them.
Can I land within the 200ft like the FAA says? Sure... I've done it a few times and even had a DPE there to show them in person. But real life I'm a first third of the runway kinda guy (after I determine landing performance)