First mod to my CJ6 Nanchang, an AoA, they are not only good for backcountry flying.
nce you get used to it you dont want to give up the advantages of flying with an AoA indicator.
In both my planes I elected a different display than the blue donut one.
I find it gives more info , and the info is given in a more progressively way.
AoA is not a warning device. It's a flight instrument. But I could fly, in decent weather, with no panel at all (and have done so.) I'd still like an AoA, where you can see where you airplane is trending in the flight envelope.My question has always been, what’s the difference in kts in flying book approach speed (1.3 Vso) vs flying the “blue donut”? If it’s not more than 5 kts, it’s not important in 99% of the flying that we do in GA.
This reference to military flying is always brought up. There’s no correlation between GA and military. A guy landing on board a ship or max performing his aircraft to the limits, needs an AoA. A typical GA pilot landing on a 5,000 ft paved runway, doesn’t need an AoA.
A stall horn or light will provide the same warning but just in a more simplified manner. If you’ve truly panicked and are about to suffer a low altitude spin accident, no AoA is going to wake you up in time to prevent a crash. It’s nothing more than an upgraded stall warning device. Something that I don’t have on neither one of my planes and somehow I’m still alive to talk about it.
My question has always been, what’s the difference in kts in flying book approach speed (1.3 Vso) vs flying the “blue donut”? If it’s not more than 5 kts, it’s not important in 99% of the flying that we do in GA.
This reference to military flying is always brought up. There’s no correlation between GA and military. A guy landing on board a ship or max performing his aircraft to the limits, needs an AoA. A typical GA pilot landing on a 5,000 ft paved runway, doesn’t need an AoA.
A stall horn or light will provide the same warning but just in a more simplified manner. If you’ve truly panicked and are about to suffer a low altitude spin accident, no AoA is going to wake you up in time to prevent a crash. It’s nothing more than an upgraded stall warning device. Something that I don’t have on neither one of my planes and somehow I’m still alive to talk about it.
Can someone ( or everyone) explain to me how an AOA is any better than a simple stall horn? It escapes me how this thing is installed to be such a miracle for stall avoidance because each wing can have a different AOA depending on current flight conditions... what’s to say while in a step turn trying to return to a runway one wing won’t be beyond critical angle while the other is not? Or am I missing something?
And here I was thinking a plane owned by the goverment flys by the same physics as a plane owned by a citizen.
How many citizens are flying a private F-18 and are operating to the limits of the airframe? That’s the type of flying where an AoA gives enough SA to matter.
One shouldn’t be violently yanking and backing their C-172 in a traffic pattern.
Your incorrect assumption is that an AOA gauge is only a tool for stall prevention.
A stall horn is a binary indicator of a single point on the wide range of AOA.
An AOA gauge is an instrument that can also tell you the best conditions for max range, max endurance, best acceleration, etc, in addition to giving you a more gradient look at the lift performance of the wing throughout the envelope.
Use of airspeed for any of those conditions are only approximate analogs (with certain weight, CG, and other assumptions) while the AOA is the actual determining performance factor.
How many citizens are flying a private F-18 and are operating to the limits of the airframe? That’s the type of flying where an AoA gives enough SA to matter.
One shouldn’t be violently yanking and backing their C-172 in a traffic pattern. If they are then they should know the limits of their aircraft before a spin occurs. If they’re too inexperienced to know the limits of their aircraft then no stall warning, or AoA device will matter. They’ll go from a blue doughnut to a red chevron in the blink of an eye and will be too preoccupied with outside distractions. SR22 accident in Houston comes to mind.
I’m not sure you answered my question
You asked why it was better than a "simple stall horn", and I gave you several reasons.
The most significant one is that a horn is a single snapshot of wing lift generation, while an AOA gauge shows the entire performance envelope of the wing.
Additional reasons include the other data about range and endurance it can provide.
But if each wing can have a different AOA, depending on flight conditions, how are you getting a true snapshot of what’s going on? You can still have one wing generating lift while the other is past CAOA...
Again, it has a lot more uses than simply stall awareness.
That being said, it is a substantially better stall awareness tool than a horn, and is especially useful when you do need to "max perform" the wing (terrain avoidance, unusual attitude recovery, etc).
I’d say number for number, probably more private planes per day are pushed toward the edge than mil planes.
There’s more to GA than flying book speeds in a 172 into a huge runway ya know
that’s what these are being sold as.
Don’t need a AoA device in order to do it safely.
Just because a study days they don't have statistical utility for that particular instance which AOA indicators are being marketed for, it doesn't in any way invalidate the other utilities.
There's a substantial difference between discussing a specific product which has a specific display of specific things being measured and a concept that can be adapted to show just about anything someone finds does have utility.
My question has always been, what’s the difference in kts in flying book approach speed (1.3 Vso) vs flying the “blue donut”? If it’s not more than 5 kts, it’s not important in 99% of the flying that we do in GA.
This reference to military flying is always brought up. There’s no correlation between GA and military. A guy landing on board a ship or max performing his aircraft to the limits, needs an AoA. A typical GA pilot landing on a 5,000 ft paved runway, doesn’t need an AoA.
A stall horn or light will provide the same warning but just in a more simplified manner. If you’ve truly panicked and are about to suffer a low altitude spin accident, no AoA is going to wake you up in time to prevent a crash. It’s nothing more than an upgraded stall warning device. Something that I don’t have on neither one of my planes and somehow I’m still alive to talk about it.
Here are some examples.
There was a discussion in go around in a loaded 182 with full flaps, some pilots with thousands of hours said go around with partial power instead of full power, so the pitch up is not as extreme, but what speed and how much power to add?
If you have an AoA indicator you dont have to guess.
Short gravel bar approach, stall warning going off, you want to land at minimum speed, you hear the stall warning but see how much lift you got thru the AoA indicator, telling exactly the amount of lift you got.
Engine quits at cruise, fly the best glide by AoA, getting the most performance of your glide.(not guessing the speed calculating the weight of the plane , temp etc)
Take off , save time and fuel flying by Vy with the AoA
Short runway, trees on the other end, get the perfect Vx with the AoA
Overshoot in the pattern (everyone can make a mistake) correct and check your AoA and will tell you whats going on before the stall warning goes off.
You dont need it, but having it adds safety and does not make you any less of a proficient pilot.
I bought mine almost 2,000hrs ago, wanted to learn to fly the backcountry in Costa Rica and there was no instructor for that, my AoA indicator was the best investment.
Bought a new plane , the CJ6 Nanchang, first mod I added was an AoA indicator.
Once you get used to one, there is no turning back.
Amen. And that's from a low time guy just out havin' fun. No sand bars, no back country strips, no low level river... well, 2 out of 3 anyway. Just having a progressive audio indication instead of a binary stall horn on short final is nice.There’s more to GA than flying book speeds in a 172 into a huge runway ya know.
Why? The edge of the STOL envelope.
I get the point you're trying to make, but that's a pretty extreme analogy....GPS to pilotage is a little different than AoA to non-AOA...So, the argument essentially is,"we don't NEED GPS...pilotage works just as well."
Here's the T-38C AOA gauge. Notice that the max range, max endurance, and optimal turn performance AOAs are marked. Also note that it shows there the buffett starts, where the actual stall AOA is, and continues to indicate post-stall (out to 1.1 AOA, but in practice it goes out to about 1.2 AOA post-stall).
A stall horn is analogous to a blank gauge with one single line at 0.9 AOA.
Yeah, a progressive audio signal would be nice.
My stall horn turns on at 47 indicated @ flaps 20 and 43 indicated at flaps 40. The mush-down or slight “break” happens at 35 indicated (20 & 40 flaps). A progressive audio would be great (or HUD of the AOA), just to keep my eyes ahead.
Vane. Pinned and flagged in the upper right corner of this pic:What is the sensor on those? Vane? One of those Pitot kinda looking lift reserve calculator things like most of the ones made for GA planes? Or something else?
Have you ever compared that at different weights. Like taking off at Gross and doing it before burning up much gas. And then doing it as light as you can?