Both? A little more context would be helpful.
It says “wing spar inspections done”.I think the field only allows three letters. Let's see: two comm radios, one is broken. A KNS80, but the indicator is bad (which makes it useless). The only thing he has is a 25 year old handheld GPS (which admittedly works pretty well, I still have mine). Oh, and the annual was due five months ago (probably because the onerous Wing spar AD not having been performed). Oh, and the registration is also expired. I really wonder if it is being "actively flown."
Ah, I misparsed the NO ACCIDENTS WING SPAR DONE as one unit.It says “wing spar inspections done”.
but then, it also says, “BEING FLOWN - NOT SITTING”.
I love the fact that it's IFR but the VOR/ILS needs a new CDI, only one of the comm radios works, It does have a KNS80 for those who want an inscrutable RNAV system.
The plane my wife learned to fly had one of those thumbwheel RNAVs in it (actually had two sets of wheels for a flip flop 2-waypoint system). Her instructor told her "NO GPS" when training. So I taught her how to transfer the RNAV coords form the Airguide (little brown book) into the RNAV. She did that one time when the instructor was along and he amended the ruling to NO RNAV (of any sort).harsh. I bet we both remember when a KNS 80 was state of the art. Sure beat the single waypoint mechanical display RNAV in a friend's Mooney.
The plane my wife learned to fly had one of those thumbwheel RNAVs in it (actually had two sets of wheels for a flip flop 2-waypoint system). Her instructor told her "NO GPS" when training. So I taught her how to transfer the RNAV coords form the Airguide (little brown book) into the RNAV. She did that one time when the instructor was along and he amended the ruling to NO RNAV (of any sort).
Me too!Flight instructors are born evil . Airguide, I used to buy those.
I don't think that's it. I started a fake listing and when it come to "flight rules," this is what I was presented with. There's no option to type in BTH.Beyond The Horizon. In the context of US flight rules, it's VFR. I take it as a marketing tool that is supposed to tell you that you can fly "further" than VFR, probably because you have some nav tool like a non IFR GPS that lets you plan something further.
I think. BTH isn't a defined flight rule. I cringe when I see it and skip to the next ad, figuring the poster doesn't know what they're talking about and therefore I can't trust buying their airplane.
General Specs
Engines / Mods / Prop
- # OF SEATS BTH
- NUMBER OF PROPELLERS BTH
That's some impressive social distancing.Beyond The Horizon.
Goes to show the web dork that set the page up ain't got a clue.So what airplanes are out there, that are certified for IFR, but not VFR? Both is a stupid option.