water-filled plastic barriers lined the course. But Amestoy said they didn’t extend past the finish line, leaving no protection between spectators and cars as they were slowing down at the end of the race.
Spectators could get within about 15 feet of the track, and many watched the race from lawn chairs in the absence of stands. Organizers reminded people to stay in the grass and off the asphalt, Amestoy said.
I bet the FAA is pleased.
I would assume the airport has received federal grants in the last 20 years. In which case, allowing drag races on the runway is a violation of their grant assurances. They are definitely on the FAA's radar now.
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure the city attorneys and other people would have looked at the legality of it.In which case, allowing drag races on the runway is a violation of their grant assurances.
Is your smiley to suggest that this post is sarcasm and the driver actually shouldn't be held responsible?The driver(s) should be held responsible for all injuries/deaths. Just like Alec Baldwin. They knew what they were doing was dangerous.
Is your smiley to suggest that this post is sarcasm and the driver actually shouldn't be held responsible?
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure the city attorneys and other people would have looked at the legality of it.
I would assume the airport has received federal grants in the last 20 years. In which case, allowing drag races on the runway is a violation of their grant assurances. They are definitely on the FAA's radar now.
I have no idea what it means. I didn't before this post, and I've even less now. But I do know that Baldwin and the driver (and others in each case) will indeed be held responsible for any negligence on their parts. Neither will be immune because of "going through the motions" or earnestness.Or does it mean that “what’s good for the goose is good for all animals, in all situations?” Or, that Alec Baldwin was only acting the part of a shooter, thereby physically going through the motions of pointing/shooting without intent to harm another, but the drivers were racing in earnest, and poor/inadequate handling of their weapon(s) resulted in negligent injuries and death? Or, that PoA is full of overly opinionated, high horse-ridin’ goofballs? Could even mean that sometimes life just makes no sense, crazy things happen, and the best you can hope for is an aviation forum where you can set it all straight?
Talk about through the fence operations.I bet the FAA is pleased.
The airport did receive grants. I believe this to be a case of non aviation types not knowing and the airport managers not being aviation type.I would assume the airport has received federal grants in the last 20 years. In which case, allowing drag races on the runway is a violation of their grant assurances. They are definitely on the FAA's radar now.
They also say they had FAA approval. Not sure if this matters.The airport did receive grants. I believe this to be a case of non aviation types not knowing and the airport managers not being aviation type.
It’s not all negative. We need people coming to the airport. Flying has risks, so does car racing. Kerrville also has two runways, so it is conceivable that operations could continue on one runway while hosting such an event.Yep, didn't read the other comments. Really surprised the FAA would allow it. We know know the outcome of promotions like this.