I disagree with the statement in part. The FAA vehemently cares about the health of those who accurately report their health status. It's easy, but not morally right, to completely hide or lie about any non-obvious physical (or cognitive) issues and get your medical cert. I had an instructor tell me "I don't tell my AME ****." Obviously, I didn't feel that was the right approach, yet these are pilots training other pilots and are so "blessed" by the infallible FAA.
The system punishes those who are open and honest about any potential concerns the FAA might bring up.
Someone earlier said "Even with a medical in hand, that doesn’t mean they will get through flight training. There are people with no history of mental issues who are not mentally fit to be pilots and told this isn’t your activity by non-medical professions."
On the flip side, there are pilots, like myself, with 400 hours TT with complex, HP and TW endorsement that were halfway through their IFR training who then find themselves, per the FAA, not fit enough to fly when the historical data, and upon any feedback from any of my CFI's, would argue otherwise. By the way, I quit training with the CFI that suggested lying about my health, so don't bother with that argument.
There are valid arguments on both sides. I think there would be less complaining if the process didn't take 1/3rd of a decade, in some instances, to come to a resolution and if there was more transparency in the process.
I'd honestly pay an expedited/"concierge" fee of up to $20K if it meant actually getting to talk to someone of consequence at the FAA vs. being a PI number in a pile of backlogged applications.