F/A 18 down in San Diego Bay

Confirmed by local source, still not much info Times of San Diego
First, I hope the pilots are ok after ejecting.
Slightly off-topic, but if this cornucopia of overlapping ads on that page with a generous 10% of the screen allocated to the actual content isn't a perfect representation of the current state of the internet, I don't know what is :lol: :lol:

Screenshot_20250212-150017.png
 
My experience is that any news source (and social media, for that matter) that uses ALL CAPS in any part of their title is usually best ignored. Certainly the mishap occurred, but best to get the details from non-caps sources.

Slightly off-topic, but if this cornucopia of overlapping ads
Come now, if you're not running the Ghostery extension in your browser, you're doing yourself a disservice. The only time I see an ad is when I'm on a browser I don't control and, yes, it's genuinely shocking how much space is taken up by ads. For that page, in particular, there wasn't an ad in sight. Delightful!
 
Come now, if you're not running the Ghostery extension in your browser, you're doing yourself a disservice. The only time I see an ad is when I'm on a browser I don't control and, yes, it's genuinely shocking how much space is taken up by ads. For that page, in particular, there wasn't an ad in sight. Delightful!
If that's like Reader Mode in Firefox, I use it a lot when available. If it's more like an ad block, I don't trust those, really.
 
If that's like Reader Mode in Firefox, I use it a lot when available. If it's more like an ad block, I don't trust those, really.
Ghostery is pretty darned trustworthy, being open-source, completely free, and arguably the most established name for ad-blocking and general privacy. I have used it forever. Alternatively, you could consider trying the duckduckgo browser and see how you like that. It has a bunch of privacy stuff built in and will nuke most ads, but not as effectively as Ghostery.
 
If that's like Reader Mode in Firefox, I use it a lot when available. If it's more like an ad block, I don't trust those, really.
If someone told me I had been using Ghostery and AdBlock Plus for 10 years I could easily believe them. Probably I have used them longer than that, totally friction free.
 
If someone told me I had been using Ghostery and AdBlock Plus for 10 years I could easily believe them. Probably I have used them longer than that, totally friction free.
Sure, but in order to discern what is and is not an ad in your browser, it has to have permission to see everything that happens there. Do you know what's happening to your data to which it has access?

My son has various ad blocker extensions in his PC browser. I once took a look at the permissions granted to these for them to work and it was not very comforting.
 
Sure, but in order to discern what is and is not an ad in your browser, it has to have permission to see everything that happens there. Do you know what's happening to your data to which it has access?

My son has various ad blocker extensions in his PC browser. I once took a look at the permissions granted to these for them to work and it was not very comforting.
Life's a tradeoff with plenty of risks. In my case I have never seen anything that would make me suspicious of these two tools. They just work. Unobtrusively. And I don't see ads. YMMV of course.
 
My wife had been reading our local fish-wrapper (now a virtual fish-wrapper, since she just to the online version) fora while now. I can't tolerate their web site, nor those of any of the TV stations. Pages stacked so deep with ads and pop-ups they it's a challenge to find the content they do have, and even then it's generally just recycled and paraphrased from various online sources. And that's even after our use of Pihole, which cuts down dramatically on the ads we see. Anyway, they jacked up their price yet again and we canceled, and they seemed baffled. Told them why and they still didn't get it.
 
ads on that page with a generous 10% of the screen allocated to the actual content

I love my ad blocker. "uBlock Origin" blocked 28 things on that page.
 

Attachments

  • PoA-temp.jpg
    PoA-temp.jpg
    128.8 KB · Views: 10
Gotta wonder how many Chinese and Russian divers are trying to slip in and find bits and pieces of that before the Navy gets it back off the bottom...
 
Near the airport, sounds like it was coming in for recovery. A few hours after the crash, 1000 or so OVC, -RA.
Glad they made it out, at least mostly ok. With interviews, ATC, and any data, contributors should be known soon. We may not find out any time soon though.
 
Gotta wonder how many Chinese and Russian divers are trying to slip in and find bits and pieces of that before the Navy gets it back off the bottom...


An 18? They probably already have everything they want or need.
 
Gotta wonder how many Chinese and Russian divers are trying to slip in and find bits and pieces of that before the Navy gets it back off the bottom...
I don't understand why. From what I hear, the Chinese clones already fly as if they were recovered from the deep, and the Russians would save money by claiming they already built one . . . But, it caught fire and crashed.
 
Not sure if @35 AoA is in VAQ-135 but is a Growler guy. Hopefully you weren’t visiting North Island today??
 
Sorry to interrupt the discussion of browser blockers, but there really is more on-topic info available.

Nauga,
and flashy things
“…According to radio traffic at the time of the crash, the two-seat electronic attack aircraft was approaching NAS North Island. After flying over the runway, the crew of the aircraft ejected, and the plane crashed into the water…”

Wonder if they were planning a full stop and had to go around, or were doing a practice approach.
 
Here ya go:
Oh... I've seen that more than a couple of times, believe me. I was talking about a new version, y'know... though I don't think the water off San Diego is all that clear. Probably best to just watch sonar from above and drop a charge.
 
Video of impact, from the photo above, a zoom and then a dive after ejection. There is a ring video of the final dive from another angle.

 
“…According to radio traffic at the time of the crash, the two-seat electronic attack aircraft was approaching NAS North Island. After flying over the runway, the crew of the aircraft ejected, and the plane crashed into the water…”

Wonder if they were planning a full stop and had to go around, or were doing a practice approach.
Or an overhead break.
 
My experience is that any news source (and social media, for that matter) that uses ALL CAPS in any part of their title is usually best ignored. Certainly the mishap occurred, but best to get the details from non-caps sources.


Come now, if you're not running the Ghostery extension in your browser, you're doing yourself a disservice. The only time I see an ad is when I'm on a browser I don't control and, yes, it's genuinely shocking how much space is taken up by ads. For that page, in particular, there wasn't an ad in sight. Delightful!

I prefer AdBlock Plus. Both work...

Tim
 
Ghostery is pretty darned trustworthy, being open-source, completely free, and arguably the most established name for ad-blocking and general privacy. I have used it forever. Alternatively, you could consider trying the duckduckgo browser and see how you like that. It has a bunch of privacy stuff built in and will nuke most ads, but not as effectively as Ghostery.
DuckDuckGo is more about privacy than blocking ads. I use Project Tor for most web searches and research; even stronger on the privacy side.

Tim
 
Maybe. But from what was said about the weather, what the weather looked like in photos and the relationship to the horizon in the photos I wouldn’t bet on it.

Fuel exhaustion? Or some other issue? The media reported on a couple sources the engine noise stopped before the plane crashed into the water. If so, the crew might have known there was an issue and pre-emptively bailed.

Tim
 
When you put this and the Fairbanks F-35 together you kind of have to wonder what’s up with landing a fighter these days…both had gear down and punched…as an Army Aviator we always were told ejection seats were overrated….(This is a Joke or a micro-aggression depending on your age…) Hope the crew are safe and sound and equipment can be replaced…let’s never forget that. Otherwise gotta say the O club at North Island was always the best…
 
Life's a tradeoff with plenty of risks. In my case I have never seen anything that would make me suspicious of these two tools. They just work. Unobtrusively. And I don't see ads. YMMV of course.
As an old, long-time IT security guy who still mingles with anti-hack coders, "YMMV" is all to true. Proceed with caution with add-ons; there are many add-ons that could, if the developer wanted to (many do), keylog whatever you do when your browser is running. There's no harm until it happens when you do any online banking or email proprietary information. Even if what you send is encrypted, if you're keylogged it doesn't matter. Just sayin'. :cool:
 
Back
Top