Well, I tried to hold back. I just can’t.
I absolutely love safety videos, but this one is a POS.
I agree.
The information in the video was nowhere near sufficient to make a determination of anything, let alone hazardous attitudes. The pilot took off VFR with a 4000 ft ceiling. So what? That's VFR. Now, yes, he would have to climb over the mountains to the north, but the video doesn't give us an indication of the weather up that way.
Then he flew into IMC and lost control. VFR-into-IMC is a common problem, and doesn't necessarily imply a hazardous attitude. Bad planning, bad decision making, possibly, but "hazardous attitude" is a bit of a leap without any additional information.
They claim the guy showed 3 of the 5 attitudes. But if he was truly "anti-authority", I would have expected him to just turn northbound, turn on the autopilot, and fly right through the clouds.
And yeah, 1977? 42 years before the accident? I like to think I'm better and smarter now than I was 42 years ago. The video assumes he hasn't learned anything in those 42 years, from a 33-year-old non-instrument rated private pilot to a 10,000 hour 75-year-old instrument rated pilot.
Yes, all the things the video claims are possible. But it doesn't make a strong case for any of them.