How long have you been an ADA attorney?
How long have you been an airline attorney?
blue placards are so easy to get, doctors give them out to patients that really don't need them, because they don't want to shame their patients and risk losing their business
If handicap placards are so easy to get, then how come so many disabled people can't get them?
It seems people with money and power are much more likely to get handicap placards whether they need them or not.
It seems the people that are poor because they are disabled, have the hardest time getting handicap place cards? Is that fair?
What kinda irks me, especially when I drive around a person in a wheelchair is being beaten to the handicap spot by someone whose handicap is morbid obesity. Dude/lady, you should park at the far end, you need the exercise.
How long have you been a doctor?
Sounds like you have a lot of problems. Anger management and prejudice. So you hate people because they are fat? You blame them because they are fat? So you assume that being fat is morally their fault? Sometimes being fat is a symptom of other health problems. Hormone problems, pain, diabetes, etc.
If you're driving around someone in a wheelchair, why don't you just drop them off at a loading zone at the front door then park in a regular parking space?
I think that I could teach a monkey how to do a heart cath but I'm not so sure that a dog can do medically necessary work, whatever that means in terms of service animals.
Seizure alerting, calming someone with PSD, alerting and guiding away from fire, etc.
You still haven't support your claim that service dogs are required to be on the floor on an airline. Can't you support your claims with specific legislation for service dogs?
No joy you got specific answers to your question but yet you simply refuse to accept them. Don't start a poll if it's just going to be your view point.
Why should I believe "answers" when people don't support their claims with specific legislation to support their specific claims? Why should I believe people, when I can find official information and legislation that seems to indicate otherwise?
You can start by reading CFR 383.37 Seat Assignments. You'll see none of it allows the service animal to physically occupy a seat. The animal has to be a the seat location of the disabled person. Most likely a bulkhead seat if requested. If the seat location doesn't accomadate the passenger and animal then another seat must be offered IF AVAILABLE.
Don't most disabled people occupy seats? I think seat location can be interpreted as meaning service dogs are allowed in the seat.
Where is specific legislation that specifically bars service dogs from airline seats? Where is specific legislation that specifically says service dogs have to be on the floor?
The airline handled the situation by the book. The man overreacted and acted like a child. I don't care what kind of mental condition he has, there's no excuse for that kind of conduct.
What book specifically bars service dogs from seats? What book instructs to antagonize and discriminate against the disabled?
Also we know nothing about the past history of this man. For those of you who think 100 % disability is hard to get and anyone who has been to combat is a "war veteran," think again. Fraudulent PTSD claims are a hot topic in the military right now. VA disability claims as a whole are at an all time high. I know of at least 3 people who I went to combat with who never actually saw combat and are getting 3 grand per month tax free for PTSD. One guy went home on R&R (never shot at) and didn't come back. Just young, immature people who didn't like the military and didn't want to work, found a way for the system to work for them.There's a big difference between serving in a combat zone and being a combat veteran. So, before I stick up for someone and say they deserve all the benefits that a veteran deserves, I'd at least like to know their history first.
So it's okay to discriminate against disabled veterans just because some people scam the system?
I know of an Iraqi war veteran that received brain damage from an IED. His brain damage was so bad he couldn't talk, dress himself, feed himself, walk, etc. The government and the government provided healthcare, only allowed a fraction of his disability. The government and the government provided healthcare, claimed he had pre-existing conditions. If any alleged pre-existing conditions were significantly disabling, then how did he qualify for combat without restrictions?