Forensic analysis...i.e. a magnifier with someone who has a clue? It's fairly easy to differentiate pen strokes from even a hires copy. Autograph collectors have been doing it for ages.
Forensic analysis...i.e. a magnifier with someone who has a clue? It's fairly easy to differentiate pen strokes from even a hires copy. Autograph collectors have been doing it for ages.
Forensic analysis...i.e. a magnifier with someone who has a clue? It's fairly easy to differentiate pen strokes from even a hires copy. Autograph collectors have been doing it for ages.
I don't know why people are worked up. Carry it with you. If you lose your wallet they'll send you a new one. They don't even charge unlike your PILOT CERTIFICATE that they want $2.
I suspect you're right, but Inspector Clouseau himself wouldn't use his magnifier to ground evil airman who make a color copy of their medical certificate.
"WTF, is this a copy? Up against the airplane and spread 'em!"
Just a practical observation.
It has an AME's signature on it, just not your AME's signature. I assume is some AME on the staff at OKC.Would it be correct that the replacement doesn't have the ME's signature on it?
The original question was about a photocopy, not about one faxed from the FAA, so nothing the FAA told you about your faxed certificate (issued by the FAA and thus legal) answers the original question.Actually, the "answer" is in post #46 above. My faxed certificate is perfectly legal according to OKC a few minutes ago.
One issued by an AME (an FAA designee) is also "issued" by the FAA, and thus also was not relevant to the question originally asked (which was about a photocopy of the one issued by the FAA).FYI, I addressed the AME issued certificate question in post #46 as well.
a digital copy of your medical certificate is legal but digital certificates can only be issued by OKC. If you have a typical medical certificate that was issued locally by an AME you're required to carry the original with an original signature. Here's a link regarding replacement medical certificates.
http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certific...aq/response17/
I think the answer to the original question is pretty simple. If the paper was given to you by the FAA or its designee, it was "issued" by the FAA and thus is legal. If the paper came out of a photocopier you were operating, it was not "issued" by the FAA, and thus is not legal.
Beyond that, whether you're going to get caught using a copy you made yourself, and what the FAA might do if they happen to find out you're doing that is another story entirely, and one which will depend on the situation and circumstances.
It has an AME's signature on it, just not your AME's signature. I assume is some AME on the staff at OKC.
Mine's signed by Courtney Scott, the manager of the FAA Aeromedical Division. I assume that's an administrative procedure because I doubt Dr. Scott personally reviewed my case file.
I think the answer to the original question is pretty simple. If the paper was given to you by the FAA or its designee, it was "issued" by the FAA and thus is legal. If the paper came out of a photocopier you were operating, it was not "issued" by the FAA, and thus is not legal.
Beyond that, whether you're going to get caught using a copy you made yourself, and what the FAA might do if they happen to find out you're doing that is another story entirely, and one which will depend on the situation and circumstances.
Right -- that's a document issued by the FAAI fly on a special issuance issued yearly by the FAA in OKC. It comes to me digitally, and it is then mailed. The one they mailed to me is also printed from the digital file. It is NOT hand signed but computer generated.
So, if I read what you wrote correctly, I can use the digital file to print myself a medical. And that's legit by everybody in this thread.
That's not a "copy" -- that's the document issued by the FAA.But, if I then take that copy
Right -- that copy would be a copy of the originally-issued document, and would not be the document issued by the FAA. The basic idea is that you can only have one valid document of each type (pilot/medical/etc certificate) at a time, and that's the one which must be with you when you fly.and use the same machine to make a copy, that's not legal?
Right -- that's a document issued by the FAA
That's not a "copy" -- that's the document issued by the FAA.
Right -- that copy would be a copy of the originally-issued document, and would not be the document issued by the FAA. The basic idea is that you can only have one valid document of each type (pilot/medical/etc certificate) at a time, and that's the one which must be with you when you fly.
I have an expired medical signed by Warren Silberman. There's a good chance that the signature is a copy, but the form came from the FAA, so it was legit.
Since you can get a replacement by contacting FAA OKC, and a PDF is sent by email, which is printed on your personal printer, who cares?
The FAA cares. I'd not risk having only a copy of my certificates. Your signature is always the original.
But I can print as many copies of the official replacement on my printer. Which one is the original?
I think your signature is what makes it original. When I received my SI and Medical I signed it in blue ink. A week or so later I received another copy (not a scan). I signed it in blue ink put it in my trifold and stored the one they e-mailed to me at the house.