Grum.Man
En-Route
Your CG is all a mess though.Fuel consumption goes way down if you don't have an engine. So does empty weight.
Your CG is all a mess though.Fuel consumption goes way down if you don't have an engine. So does empty weight.
Your CG is all a mess though.
ya but....too much and you'll go slower.Aft CG makes you go faster.
ya but....too much and you'll go slower.
Oh....You'd just need to go really fast to have enough elevator authority to keep the back end of the plane from falling out from under you.
Or not at all if your tie down is buried in the ground.Aft CG makes you go faster.
I know that plane. Belonged to Paul Summit back in the day. Very nice.
No more ADs than anything else on the IO-550-B itself. Aftermarket cylinders are a problem and some ancillary stuff.A36 Bon has ContbEng too many ADs!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A Grumman Tiger, maybe, but not a Traveler. Most modern day Travelers are going to be somewhere around 1300-1400# empty, add 220# fuel, and your useful load goes down to about 600#. Plus, with the shorter horizontal stabilizer, you don't want too much aft loading with baggage and such.
The Traveler is really a two person plane, with room to throw stuff in the backseat. Maybe a Cheetah might be a better/cheaper consideration, until the kids get older.
in a word "operating cost"Can anyone explain to me why I can buy a loaded 60's-70's 310 for the same price as a VFR or barely IFR 60's-70's 172?
...Grumman piece of sh...!