JHW
En-Route
If you have a TN bo, don't loaf at 180 kts. Go higher and add 20.
If you have a TN bo, don't loaf at 180 kts. Go higher and add 20.
Though I didn't take the time to quote it, the idea to look at the TN A36 came from a couple posts in this thread. Admittedly I am writing from a place of relative ignorance and I appreciate everyone's guidance and advice.
My 3 kids weigh a combined 125 lbs soaking wet. My wife and I together are 350 lbs and I'm nearly 2/3 of that. So is a twin in our future when my boys are 175+ each? I think I get that picture. What I'm trying to say / ask is it looks like I may have found a plane that could support my dual mission for the next 5+ years, so what do you think?
Indeed, TAT quotes 196 KTAS @ 15.1 gph FL220.
Since for me currently this is an academic discussion I thought 180 KTAS @ 14.5 FL125 looked better for a couple reasons.k
My wife and I together are 350 lbs and I'm nearly 2/3 of that.
Now you have just published your wife's exact weight on the interwebs. You may need to split the plane in half before you buy it.
Indeed, TAT quotes 196 KTAS @ 15.1 gph FL220.
Since for me currently this is an academic discussion I thought 180 KTAS @ 14.5 FL125 looked better for a couple reasons.
1) 180 KTAS made the discussed trip in a leg I feel I could do nonstop with no PAX.
2) I have no experience sucking O2 in a non pressurized plane. I've been suba diving a few time, relevant or no?
3) with family along the lack of O2 experience is multiplied, what has been your experience with children < 5 yr old on O2?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've been looking into the TN A36 and if i'm reading this right it's pretty impressive.
180 kt @ 14.6 gph FL125 does the trip from PHX to MKC in just over 5 hours on ~80 gals of fuel. Bird has 6 seats with 1600 useful load and would make my most common family trip from PHX to FAT seem like getting take out.
http://www.trade-a-plane.com/detail/1782437.html
It is a dream... and now I want to make it a reality!