And that's what happens when you recycle a CFL?... With 'recycling', you mean 'ship it back to china where a 7 year old with a blowtorch in a backyard will melt it down for its copper content'...
How come I've replaced 1 CFL in 3 years and you're replacing them on a daily basis?Wouldn't you know it. Another day, another CFL to replace.
And that's what happens when you recycle a CFL?
How come I've replaced 1 CFL in 3 years and you're replacing them on a daily basis?
-harry
Wouldn't you know it. Another day, another CFL to replace.
This one in the utility room which is more of a closet in this home (only contains the air-handler, not much more). If it has seen a 100hrs of use in its life it's a lot.
This one was marketed by GE but 'fabrique en chine'. The base is coked up similar to the one in the picture.
Wouldn't you know it. Another day, another CFL to replace.
This one in the utility room which is more of a closet in this home (only contains the air-handler, not much more). If it has seen a 100hrs of use in its life it's a lot.
This one was marketed by GE but 'fabrique en chine'. The base is coked up similar to the one in the picture.
CFLs are stupid when LEDs are available as direct replacements for nearly every bulb now.
This is a reasonable responseYou waited for another one to go bad? When I tried them, after the first one started Smoking, I removed and inspected all the installed ones. They all looked like the one in your photo or worse. No fixture got a CFL installed again!
This isn'tI don't care how much mr. mantakos want to force these up my A**, it just won't happen.
They hadn't gotten there the last time I bought bulbs a few months ago. Some were a reasonable price for the expected lamp life, others weren't. At the time, I couldn't find replacements for my recessed kitchen lights and ceiling fan. I suppose I could look on-line, but I don't consider it an easy replacement unless I can just pick it up at my local Menards, Home Depot, Lowes, or Ace store.CFLs are stupid when LEDs are available as direct replacements for nearly every bulb now.
According to this link, some are dimmableNot when you're paying the bill and CFLS are $2-$6 while LEDs are $20-$100.
I will be looking into getting soem LEDs if they can dim like incandescents.
Not when you're paying the bill and CFLS are $2-$6 while LEDs are $20-$100.
I will be looking into getting soem LEDs if they can dim like incandescents.
They hadn't gotten there the last time I bought bulbs a few months ago. Some were a reasonable price for the expected lamp life, others weren't. At the time, I couldn't find replacements for my recessed kitchen lights and ceiling fan. I suppose I could look on-line, but I don't consider it an easy replacement unless I can just pick it up at my local Menards, Home Depot, Lowes, or Ace store.
According to this link, some are dimmable
http://www.besthomeledlighting.com/
and expensive.
Sorry- I'm not re-wiring my house for DC.Shop directly in China online. I went through the process 2 years ago and found everything. Dimmable is an issue that requires going to DC power, trust me on this....BTDT, spent a lot of time and effort trying to get the warbling out of the light but couldn't get it to be acceptable in the low lumen ranges. The cheaper ones will strobe rather than warble the light and may lose 10% of their lumens before shutting off completely.
You don't need to buy them locally because they don't fail frequently. Buy 5% extra and you're set for life.
You don't think "I don't care how much mr. mantakos wants me to use them it just won't happen." isn't a better response?Why's it an unreasonable response?
Why's it an unreasonable response?
He wants laws against the rest of us using what we want to use. He's been clear on that.
....
Sorry- I'm not re-wiring my house for DC.
You don't think "I don't care how much mr. mantakos wants me to use them it just won't happen." isn't a better response?
Again, I really don't want to change or run wiring. The dimmer is on the wall; the lamps I want to dim are in the ceiling in the ceiling fan that runs off 120VAC.You don't have to. You use your AC to power the DC transformer and hook up the rest of the circuit carrying the dimmable LCDs to the DC power supply. I didn't change any of the wiring out.
You don't think "I don't care how much mr. mantakos wants me to use them it just won't happen." isn't a better response?
AgreedThere is a difference in someone simply "Wanting" someone else to do something and someone advocating the Force of law to get someone to do it.
And you made your point in terms better suited for SZI am normally mild mannered in my communication, and I confess that I was going to use "force it down my Th*****". but that term has been used so much in the news lately it sounded stale, and the spelling just did not look right to me. So, my former Marine instinct came out and figured the other end (simpler spelling) is just as good to express the idea. And the idea is just as valid...
And you made your point in terms better suited for SZ
If that's big an issue for "the rest of us," why don't elections and legislation reflect that?
Well it did. Look at what happened to Congress and the majority of state legislatures recently.
In addition the EPA officials that mandate this crap aren't elected officials.
Yes, the leadership is appointed by elected officials, but in the meantime they can mandate just about ane environmental regulation they want with out any input from the general public.
Once these new regulations are enacted they are almost impossible to overturn.
Again, I really don't want to change or run wiring. The dimmer is on the wall; the lamps I want to dim are in the ceiling in the ceiling fan that runs off 120VAC.
I'm pretty sure most of the rest of us really don't want to design AC to DC circuits with transformers or switching power supplies.
EDIT: If one needs to design or add circuits to make LEDs work, they really aren't replacements for incandescent lamps for most people.
You aren't making yourself very clear. I don't doubt it can be done, but let's look at this statement:What part of "No rewiring" involved is unclear. It takes all the wiring you use right now, you make a total of 8 wire connections and install $27 worth of hardware in the circuit and you are still using your same dimmer switch on the wall. If you don't need dimming, you can just use the plug in/screw in replacement bulbs on AC no problem. Personally I don't care what light bulb you use. I'm just saying that the perceived problems stated with LEDs are not accurate. Retrofitting for LED to get best effect out of it is more than a 10 cent deal, that's true, but the reduction in consumption is pretty good. On boats they have the extra advantage of reducing the heat load, especially in confined spaces, that we got from incandescent lights. Considering we were operating in the tropics, that was a good thing as it took a large load off of our AC system. If you live in a cold climate, that advantage gets reduced.
I make a total of 8 wire connections: Where are these connections?What part of "No rewiring" involved is unclear. It takes all the wiring you use right now, you make a total of 8 wire connections and install $27 worth of hardware in the circuit and you are still using your same dimmer switch on the wall.
You aren't making yourself very clear. I don't doubt it can be done, but let's look at this statement:
I make a total of 8 wire connections: Where are these connections?
$27 worth of hardware: aside from a transformer and a rectifier, what else is needed? Does it need to be a full bridge rectifier or would a simple diode suffice? Any filtering needed?
I read transformers here- do you mean those things with two coils of wires with a ferrite core between them?You don't have to. You use your AC to power the DC transformer and hook up the rest of the circuit carrying the dimmable LCDs to the DC power supply. I didn't change any of the wiring out.
All the laptops I know about use switching power supplies. I'm confused about the earlier statement with transformers since switching power supplies don't have them. The DC side of these power supplies is 12 or 24V.Everything per circuit required except for the bulbs cost $27 from RS Components. Just cheap stuff, power supply like for a piece of electronics to laptop depending on how many bulbs in the circuit and a small stepper for the dimmer to control since we were using BTacino tap style dimmer controls. Trying to do it AC was proving expensive and impossible, but DC, no worries.
Only if you believe in the corrupted interpretation of the commerce clause. I guess the feds should send in the National Guard to protect Texans from the evil and dangerous incandescent bulb.Unconstitutional.
I've started buying R30 LED lamps instead of CFLs for the recessed cans that are all over my house. The LEDs don't take 5 minutes to get brighter than a candle which was my chief objection to the CFLs but right now the LEDs cost $35 each compared to about $3 for a CFL. I'm hoping they last a long time.CFLs are stupid when LEDs are available as direct replacements for nearly every bulb now.
Only if you believe in the corrupted interpretation of the commerce clause. I guess the feds should send in the National Guard to protect Texans from the evil and dangerous incandescent bulb.
I'm not sure how the regulation of lightbulbs and power consumption isn't interstate commerce, even under the "purest" concept of the term....
How about lightbulbs made in Texas and sold in Texas ?
Are they interstate because electrons flow through them that crossed a stateline ?
Presuming you apply the plain meaning of "interstate commerce," yes.
Made in Texas and consumed in Texas would be intrastate commerce, not interstate.
For starters, you have the electricity and all of the collateral consequences. But let's overlook that.
Even if something remains "in-state," it nevertheless has an impact on interstate commerce. It could be anything from travelling on a road to complying with a different set of regulations which has a ripple effect (ironically, check out the effect Texas has on school textbooks for an example of it). It also creates a "patchwork" system of law which is what the Constitution, and particularly the ICC, was created to prevent in regard to issues that affect all of us.
Now, this theory can certainly be criticized on "common sense" grounds. As in, "how can something that remains in State X, and will always remain in X, an item of interstate commerce?" And that's certainly a meritorious criticism, although it does ignore the indisputable ripple and patchwork effects.
Regardless, it's not even a slight stretch of the term "interstate commerce." It's a reasonable interpretation of the term.
Hogwash. Anyone with half a brain knows better. Lawyers make things up to suit themselves. It's up to the rest of us to call them on their BS.