Clip4
Touchdown! Greaser!
You can gift up to $15,000 per year per person.
No 1099 needed.
No 1099 is required to be filed by me, but this isn’t a gift. It is a response to an online solicitation.
You can gift up to $15,000 per year per person.
No 1099 needed.
You can gift up to $15,000 per year per person.
No 1099 needed.
Actually, it can. I don't have the wealth you, as a 1 percenter, do. So spending can reduce my wealth, by reducing the money I have saved. It can also affect future wealth.[
So that everyone is one the same page here, wealth is defined as an abundance of valuable possessions or money. Not saving lunch money too fly. If you have wealth, a airport authority billing you $7 isn’t going to chip it away.
Well, one seven dollar fee won't. But, say, you land at 15 airports in a day. I've done that. Chipping away can occur at miniscule rates, like a tiny water leak. All's fine until you see the water bill.[
So that everyone is one the same page here, wealth is defined as an abundance of valuable possessions or money. Not saving lunch money too fly. If you have wealth, a airport authority billing you $7 isn’t going to chip it away.
That’s a great analogy. I once had a pinhole leak in a pipe in the foundation. No symptoms until I got the $700 water bill.Well, one seven dollar fee won't. But, say, you land at 15 airports in a day. I've done that. Chipping away can occur at miniscule rates, like a tiny water leak. All's fine until you see the water bill.
$7 wouldn’t have scratched Ronald Reagan wealth either.
You think it’s reallt about the $7?
Also if every airport you ever fly near starts demanding $7 that’s going to add up
I agree; it's probably just an error in methodology.The sky is not falling and evil airports aren’t conspiring to chip away at your wealth of saved lunch money.
Actually, it can. I don't have the wealth you, as a 1 percenter, do. So spending can reduce my wealth, by reducing the money I have saved. It can also affect future wealth.
The sky is not falling and evil airports aren’t conspiring to chip away at your wealth of saved lunch money.
I thought he worked the ramp at an FBO.
Many times I pondered put a sign in my house that say if you are here to steal my stuff, take all of it.Just send them that $7 and see what it looks like in 5 years, 10 years.
If someone went to break into your house would you help them load your TV?
Theft is theft.
But you’re right, the sky isn’t falling, but much like a skin cancer best to have that little speck cut out than wait till it becomes something that’s really life or death.
Just the stuff in my garage.if I did, I retired
Many times I pondered put a sign in my house that say if you are here to steal my stuff, take all of it.
If you were well insured and had all the crap I do you might help them load.
I thought he worked the ramp at an FBO.
And if this happens to me, I will send a firm but polite email declining to pay unless provided with a photo of my plane at your facility or an FBO receipt that I have a copy of. This kind of erroneous billing happens now when folks write down a transposed N number. So this is an old problem attached to new technology. Apparently my call sign is so confusing, ATC can't get it straight 2 times out of 3, so maybe someone else is paying my landing fees!
Just look at what is happening in China with facial recognition and their social points system. It's only a matter of time.And is much worse than Orwell imagined
if I did, I retired
Many times I pondered put a sign in my house that say if you are here to steal my stuff, take all of it.
If you were well insured and had all the crap I do you might help them load.
Just look at what is happening in China with facial recognition and their social points system. It's only a matter of time.
<Snip>
But if it saves juuuuuuust one life!
And let’s not forget it’s for “the children”
Probably you're corrct, and exacerbated by not caring if a significant number of billings are in error. Whatever method(s) they are using are good enough to collect the bucks. Absent accountability, they'll just motor on.I agree; it's probably just an error in methodology.
Probably you're corrct, and exacerbated by not caring if a significant number of billings are in error. Whatever method(s) they are using are good enough to collect the bucks. Absent accountability, they'll just motor on.
What about the fundamental premise of billing someone for landing at a public airport? I have a problem with being charged for simply landing, taxiing back, and taking off. At an uncontrolled airport I didn’t use any services at all.
You often have difficulty with the meaning of words, don’t you?A public airport is a service.
You often have difficulty with the meaning of words, don’t you?
who do you think maintains it the airport fairy?
At an uncontrolled field? Un likely.Salty if a public airport is not a service, who do you think maintains it the airport fairy?
Some time prior to your landing and taxi the airport surface is inspected for foreign objects, you at least used that service.
If $7 is a lot of money to you, flying isn’t your hobby.
I was just there for two weeks. They seem OK with it. However, I don't know if anyone would tell me if they were uncomfortable with all the surveillance. I don't know if they don't know what they don't have, or are, as a society, happy with the security. Getting onto a high-speed train is almost like boarding a commercial jet here- scan luggage, metal detectors for people. I have to go into the "VIP" line because I don't have an ID card, they will check my passport. I have gotten questions about the mass shootings here in the USA.
Hong Kong is another situation- it's not quite part of China. They still have their own currency, laws, and other rules. I can go into Hong Kong without a visa (and will probably do so soon), I need a visa to go into China proper. I have good friends in Hong Kong who used to live in China; they have lived in HK for several years. They consider the Hong Kong people to be "wayward children" who need to be brought back into the rest of China. This is despite the relative freedom they enjoy in Hong Kong.
I am not saying you are wrong; I'm just noting that it is their country and society. I wasn't comfortable over there knowing they had enough cameras to make a real life "Truman show" of my visit- if they wanted to torture people with boredom. I don't dare make comments about their government to my friends on WeChat, not even when I'm in the USA as I don't want to create problems for them which ranges from being kicked off-line on up. I guess that's the best measure of freedom, in that I can complain about the government stupidity here. I'm a little surprised no one there has asked me "Can you really say that?"
In a sense, one can argue we have a lot of surveillance now in the USA. My car asks if it can report to the manufacturer, and it sends location data. Our phones also send location data that is stored. People have tests done by 23 and Me. Our government can ask for data in such a way that each part doesn't tell you about a person, but when combined, can be used to place an individual at a location and time, and without a warrant.
Leave it to James show Godwin's law! LOLThe fact that you don’t dare make a comment about it for fear of your friends safety speaks for itself.
People are like cows, you can do a whole ton of stuff to them, force them to walk in little lines, all sorts of stuff before you finally push them a little too far and get stomped.
I’m sure initially there were some well off Jews in Germany who were happy to see the government cracking down on those gypsies, after all it did prevent some crime, probably not until it was too late did anyone really wake up.
Government overreach is like compounding interest, doesn’t seem that impressive at first, but it doesn’t take long till it adds up.
Leave it to James show Godwin's law! LOL
I did indeed note that fact.The fact that you don’t dare make a comment about it for fear of your friends safety speaks for itself.
I suppose "how far" depends on the society. Hong Kong seems to have reached that point, while the people on the other side of the border support the crack down. People who came from the other side of the border support the crack down, too even though they have lived in Hong Kong for some years. Macau is adjusting "fine", from the point of view of the central government.People are like cows, you can do a whole ton of stuff to them, force them to walk in little lines, all sorts of stuff before you finally push them a little too far and get stomped.
I'll take this statement as an indication of what may have been said. Perhaps the gypsies did criminal actions, perhaps it was locals doing the crime until the gypsies left since the gypsies made a convenient scapegoat.I’m sure initially there were some well off Jews in Germany who were happy to see the government cracking down on those gypsies, after all it did prevent some crime, probably not until it was too late did anyone really wake up.
Agreed. It also seems like some actions seem like government overreach when the other party does it, but it becomes OK when "my" party does it.Government overreach is like compounding interest, doesn’t seem that impressive at first, but it doesn’t take long till it adds up.
I did indeed note that fact.
I suppose "how far" depends on the society. Hong Kong seems to have reached that point, while the people on the other side of the border support the crack down. People who came from the other side of the border support the crack down, too even though they have lived in Hong Kong for some years. Macau is adjusting "fine", from the point of view of the central government.
I'll take this statement as an indication of what may have been said. Perhaps the gypsies did criminal actions, perhaps it was locals doing the crime until the gypsies left since the gypsies made a convenient scapegoat.
Agreed. It also seems like some actions seem like government overreach when the other party does it, but it becomes OK when "my" party does it.
People who came from the other side of the border support the crack down, too even though they have lived in Hong Kong for some years. Macau is adjusting "fine", from the point of view of the central government.
It's more to it than that. What do you mean by "communist"? I'm not trying to be a wise guy, since the PRC is most definitely capitalist, with the main difference being that the land is owned by the state. Hong Kong was administered under the "One country, 2 systems" as formulated by Deng Xiaopeng. The Hong Kong Basic Law, negotiated prior to the handover, keeps Hong Kong as a "special administrative region" until 2047. The PRC is trying to start the changes in Hong Kong to allow integration by 2047 (that's their story). The Hong Kong people didn't become communists overnight, and aren't communists now. They want to keep the status quo ante bellum as long as possible. Maybe "bellum" is too harsh a term for the recent protests.I think there is more to it Jack. The mainland Chinese went through a revolution and the bloodletting of communist indoctrination. They are well adjusted to being part of the collective, whereas Hong Kongers were relatively free individuals until the handover, when they became communists overnight, with no indoctrination period required, and allowed to press on with pride as the financial engine of the PRC (in the early days).
I don’t work the ramp.
A matter of time? DHS already proposed full-scale use of facial recognition and has since backed off. It is already here.Just look at what is happening in China with facial recognition and their social points system. It's only a matter of time.