Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
Once there is an STC for a particular modification, the FAA typically requires you to use the STC instead of the major alteration process.
Not true..
Once there is an STC for a particular modification, the FAA typically requires you to use the STC instead of the major alteration process.
Even the FAA respects IC. Besides I suspect that the field approval would cost more than $1.50 a HP.
You'll have to prove the fuel has no negative affect on ANY and EVERY part of the fuel system from the cap to the tail pipe then you must prove that the engine makes the same HP while maintaining detonation margins at all operating temperatures.
Is this something that Jhernandez could get a field approval on instead of buying an STC?
I'd hate to see the required testing that would be required on the new un-leaded stuff we get now.
Lycoming already approved it for most of the lower compression non-turbo engines.
Lycoming is not the FAA
Do you believe a few Lycoming engines approved for 91UL will change the market that much?Sure, but amended type certificates that list 91UL as an approved fuel will take care of the 'data' when it comes to the engine part of the equation.
Do you believe a few Lycoming engines approved for 91UL will change the market that much?
If someone comes up with an STC or if the TC holders just add it in a revision, it'll fix the lead problem for the majority of the fleet. Yeah, I think it'll change the market. It will make boring planes with boring low-compression engines a lot more interesting.
That's a big If,, lycoming isn't the major portion of the market.
Post 70s Cessnas and all Pipers. If I hear a plane and look up, it's usually one of the two. Not too many Franklin powered Bellancas around.
As for the 'If', people have come up with more obscure STCs than that. Once we have a 10 year sunset on 100LL, there is going to be ample incentive to come up with solutions. Not interesting as a market for anything less than $2000 a pop, but once the alternatives are beer cans or conversion, there will be market enough even for engine changes and ignition upgrades.
yes to both.is it even economically feasible to do a mogas stc or for that purpose buy a diesel engine?
OK, so I'll bring a stupid question to the table. WHere in the USA can you still get real gasoline?
OK, so I'll bring a stupid question to the table. WHere in the USA can you still get real gasoline?
Jim
.
.
.
A list of gas stations carrying ethanol-free gas in the U.S. and Canada:
http://www.pure-gas.org/
A list of airports:
http://www.flyunleaded.com/airports.php
Several other online resources and groups that get access to it:
http://e0pc.com/
http://www.aviationfuelclub.org/
An Avweb podcast with Ken Misegades on this subject, which provided the seeds to finding the above and contains other suggestions:
http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Whatever_Happened_To_Mogas_202861-1.html
This list is not complete. There are dozens of mogas sites in Wichita alone that are not on this list.
Depends where in the country you are. In areas where oxygeneates are required by law, you may not find refining stock that is suitable for making any sort of legal (off road or not) gasoline without ethanol being added to it.I'm going to resurrect this zombie thread yet again to answer.
Alcohol is NOT in the gas when it's put into the tanker at the terminal. It is added separately, then slosh-mixes on the way to the gas station and as it's poured into the ground tank.
Many terminals will sell non-oxygenated gasoline for off-road use.
Depends where in the country you are. In areas where oxygeneates are required by law, you may not find refining stock that is suitable for making any sort of legal (off road or not) gasoline without ethanol being added to it.
Depends where in the country you are. In areas where oxygeneates are required by law, you may not find refining stock that is suitable for making any sort of legal (off road or not) gasoline without ethanol being added to it.
Almost every larger town has a place that automotive racers get their fuel that is almost always ethanol free. Ask at the local track.
Almost every larger town has a place that automotive racers get their fuel that is almost always ethanol free. Ask at the local track.
Some racing fuel is methanol and not gas at all.
So let's say you have a plane that requires no mechanical modifications to run Mogas, just new placards and a page in the POH.... What if you don't actually buy the STC and just run the stuff anyway?
Your airplane will automatically crash into a school for handicapped children and your insurance will not pay.
Handicapped blind children. Get it right. Sheesh.
Almost every larger town has a place that automotive racers get their fuel that is almost always ethanol free. Ask at the local track.
100LL is so much cheaper around here we were always chasing hot rodders away
"Oh your car has cats, you really don't want this stuff!"
It's not just about the money, Nate.
Running MoGas, or at least a 50/50 blend is better for your engine if you have an old low compression continental that was designed to burn 80 octane.
At least that's been my experience with both an o300 and o470. They both seemed to like a 2/3 MoGas to 1/3 avgas mix best. Cleaner plugs, smoother running, tighter EGT spreads, etc.
Remember that the old 80 octane avgas was basically the same gas as the old leaded 87 octane mogas.
Almost every larger town has a place that automotive racers get their fuel that is almost always ethanol free. Ask at the local track.