But to your point, I agree. Some on PoA love to use their current income as justification as to why they don't fly professionally, but they're coming from the point of view of someone established with a family and other responsibilities. For the young kids, it's fine. I made $24K my first year of doing this as a living (instructing), and made it work. Yes I had roommates. Yes I ate like garbage (two tacos at Jack In The Box for 99 cents!!!), but it was actually some of the most fun I had. Then I moved on to 340s, 421s - eventually popping my turbine cherry in the Cheyenne II making $50K/yr - and thought I had died and gone to heaven.
What year was that? I ask because up until VERY recently that was still the going wage and the industry hadn’t made any changes in wages for a decade, as inflation did its usual thing. Most places in that gap between 250 and 1500 hours are solidly stuck at somewhere around $30K for their true starting salary.
“Making it work” with around $30K a year was a completely different thing in the 90s than almost thirty years later with normal inflation rates.
Heck I did that, outside of aviation, too, and even managed a little fun money for flying for a while until I racked up personal debts. No problem. That was when a “non-$0.99 taco” fast food meal was about $5. Not $12. And gas was under $2. (Just using fast food as an example of inflation, yes there’s always been ways to eat cheaper than fast food... it’s just to show the price changes since then.)
And let’s be honest, the industry hasn’t truly changed their pay scale. They changed their hiring bonuses to cover up the fatal flaw in their first year numbers. Those bonuses will be the first thing to disappear at any place that loses a major contract and furloughs start.
There’s a lot of job risk still at the low end but not anywhere near as much risk as the insanity levels of the 90s. So that part got marginally better.
Places can still be severely mismanaged, and a handful definitely are.
I can’t think of how many years it’s been since we didn’t hire junior people into IT at or above $50K with real bennies and 401Ks and matching and such. The place I’m at now competes with other IT gigs only because they pay even better than that because their bennies package is weak.
When I was managing our team I made it clear I thought we’d lose our most junior guy if we didn’t pay him well enough to purchase a home in the Denver market, which was already setting price records back then and has done nothing but go up 8% a year for over a decade.
They paid him, he bought his townhouse, and as far as I can tell, is a pretty happy camper.
I don’t think it’s JUST people’s “current salary” they’re looking over when they think about it.
It’s the lack of benefits, the entry level salary not truly being what they say it is (the hiring bonus silliness), a couple decades not keeping up with inflation, and a lot of other things like real job and life risk that some of these companies don’t exist in a few years.
Hiring may be great right now, but that doesn’t mean a significant jump in fuel costs due to some unforeseen geo-political horsepucky doesn’t kill a few more regionals like those events always have.
There’s a reason why the slang in business for a poorly managed company is called a “fly by night company”.
That should be somewhat embarrassing for the aviation industry but aviation wears that one more with pride than shame. The game is moving self loading and non self loading cargo at the bottom dollar.
You also have to love the travel life and moving. When we do that to someone in IT, that’s a six figure starting salary on day one and if they’re on the road for more than three days we even pay their laundry costs. But then again, we don’t make them wear polyester suits, either. We actually wouldn’t want them to look that poor in front of customers.