denverpilot
Tied Down
It's as hard for CFIs to fire students as it is for students to fire CFIs.
It's as hard for CFIs to fire students as it is for students to fire CFIs.
I've refused to sign off a instrument competency check for someone who had lost cognitive skill because of aging. It was pretty apparent on the first flight and I could tell it wasn't getting better by about the third. He was disappointed, in himself mostly, but I think he knew what was going on.It's as hard for CFIs to fire students as it is for students to fire CFIs.
It's as hard for CFIs to fire students as it is for students to fire CFIs.
On the other hand, how many times has he signed her off thinking she would not pass? Does that sound like a good CFI? If he's trying to discourage her then he is the one who should be saying, "no". I can't count the times I've read on this board that applicants should not worry because their CFI wouldn't sign them off if the CFI didn't think they were ready. That's obviously not the case here.
I'm not a CFI, but I've fired a ground school student before. We were working through the instrument material, and he just never read or did what I asked, never came prepared. I wasn't even charging him. at all.
I finally told him, in kind of a mean way. "you are wasting my time, and yours. I'm done. when you want to be serious about this, give me a call. and next time, is $40/hr".
Where I used to fly, I knew of a flight instructor who had the same student for nearly a year, and the student wasn't good enough to even solo! I don't know how many hours or how much money that person spent, but alot. That person kept coming back, apparently they kept doing the same thing over and over and the student still couldn't even solo. After so much time and so much money spent, I lost respect for that instructor that he kept taking the money but clearly lacked the guts and honesty to simply tell that person that flying was not for him and he shouldn't waste any more money. I left that place so I don't know what happened, but I would be incredibly shocked if that person ever passed a checkride.
Your point is? Obviously she needs to take some of the blame for not saying, "no" if she didn't think she was ready, but he also needs to take a good share of the blame for signing her off if he didn't think she was ready.IIRC, he has signed her off twice, once at 150hrs and once 60 days and 17 hrs later.
Lots of good points have been made for the OP to consider. One thing that bothered me is a CFI who would recommend a student for a checkride knowing the student was not ready. DPEs aren't infallible. What if by chance the stars and planets had aligned and the student had passed? Just warning the student not to fly without additional training is ridiculous. If she had passed the first checkride and taken her family up for a ride and killed them all what then?
I think maybe there should be "term limits" for instructors, ~20% over minimums. Say you have 50hrs into a PP candidate, you have to turn them over to another instructor or at least have to advise them that they should consider another instructor. Different people communicate differently. If you have 150 hrs and have gone through 3 instructors, chances are you aren't going to master aviation to a safe standard. If you have 167hrs and haven't realized you aren't learning, I can't help but agree with the instructors final conclusion and blunt "make no mistakes about it" final encounter.
Sort of to this point, if I recall, in my part 141 primary experience, we had stage checks with other instructors and could not move on without passing that stage. It was also an opportunity for another CFI to work with you and provide feedback to both you the student and to your primary instructor. Perhaps the whole issue for the OP could have been solved in a 141 program, but that's based on my assumption that she's doing this part 61.
That was your mistake. When you don't put a value on what you are doing, neither will others. Charge them $40hr and they put forth some effort to get their moneys worth.
You're absolutely right, Henning. My thought was, he was also struggling to afford things, and some of his ideas/perceptions scared the crap out of me, so I thought I would help him out. I needed teaching experience, and he needed some help with stuff. I wasnt really struggling for money, so i thought it would be win win really. It backfired.
Interesting, what do you see as the issue to solve?
Good Question, there's so many issues here for her on so many levels. Perhaps just having another set of eyes, experience, teaching style, and the systemic part 141 stop-gaps in place to deal fairly and honestly with the OP early on in the learning process, things which might have been able to honestly assess her performance, from more than one instructor. This might have provided, for the lack of a better word, "remediation" and if that did not work, then a discussion of whether the OP should have continued based on her ability to meet the standards set up within the stage check process.
Again, not having the whole picture available makes this more of an academic discussion rather than a critique.
I don't think teaching style makes much difference at this point. At 160hrs, if you're gonna learn this (physically flying an airplane), you'd have learned it on your own if all the instructor ever did was keep you from killing yourself in the process.
Would you think that a person who has not figured out how to trim an airplane at 150hrs is ever really going to be a safe pilot?
That's just my point. It's not teaching style. It's a systemic process, with measures of satisfactory progress (which was missing here)-beyond which a student could not move past early on in the OP's training. This might have stopped her from going to 160+ hours, and then being told what she reported as being told by her instructor (a real problem at that stage of the game in my humble opinion).
IIRC, he has signed her off twice, once at 150hrs and once 60 days and 17 hrs later. I take none of this story at face value.
You recall incorrectly. Two instructors. Your home work for today is to read posts 19, 11, and 1.
If you take none of the story at face value then you shouldn't be commenting. Saracelica's factual claims have been consistent since the first time I read about her first failed check ride.
It's as hard for CFIs to fire students as it is for students to fire CFIs.
I don't think teaching style makes much difference at this point. At 160hrs, if you're gonna learn this (physically flying an airplane), you'd have learned it on your own if all the instructor ever did was keep you from killing yourself in the process.
Would you think that a person who has not figured out how to trim an airplane at 150hrs is ever really going to be a safe pilot?
Basically, the answer to the title of this thread is "Yes".
1. How does anyone get past hour number 3 without knowing how to trim?Henning gets it. Poor Sara shows up, crying the blues, and the board falls over themselves. Read her post #2. Most telling post of the thread...shows the level of maturity and mental state.
167 hours...? NFW...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Henning gets it. Poor Sara shows up, crying the blues, and the board falls over themselves. Read her post #2. Most telling post of the thread...shows the level of maturity and mental state.
167 hours...? NFW...
I did the first half of my primary training in a 150 and didn't really learn how to trim until I transitioned to a 172.1. How does anyone get past hour number 3 without knowing how to trim?
I missed where Sara said anything about flying left seat? Her husband won't let her land the plane when he is PIC. Depending on what kind of plane it is, that might be very reasonable. I wouldn't let anyone try to land my plane who isn't at least checked out in make and model. As a 10-hour student pilot a friend once put me in the left seat and let me try to land her Cardinal. She had never before practiced trying to salvage someone else's botched landing. All of my experience to date had been in a 150... I was a fish out of water and so was she. We nearly pranged her plane in the process. Unless Sara's husband is a CFI, he probably has no business playing checkout pilot.2. Her husband won't let her fly left seat?? My 16 year old son with 20 hours of dual and a couple solo flies left seat whenever we fly VFR! I think her husband knows she can't fly! he overtrims occasionally.
Concur.3. A surprise check ride is a d-bag trick, I doubt it would have been any different 24 hours later.
I don't think the CFI ever imagined she would pass. He's trying to get rid of her and she doesn't want to go. I have seen this play out before.
Then said CFI needs to find a spine and say no. I've only had to "fire" 2 students. One of them wasn't cut out to be a pilot. The other, I didn't like and couldn't stand sharing the ramp with, much less a cockpit and I let him go as well.
I'll give a little on the trim area, BUT who sends a student to a check ride that doesn't understand the airplane?I did the first half of my primary training in a 150 and didn't really learn how to trim until I transitioned to a 172.
I missed where Sara said anything about flying left seat? Her husband won't let her land the plane when he is PIC. Depending on what kind of plane it is, that might be very reasonable. I wouldn't let anyone try to land my plane who isn't at least checked out in make and model. As a 10-hour student pilot a friend once put me in the left seat and let me try to land her Cardinal. She had never before practiced trying to salvage someone else's botched landing. All of my experience to date had been in a 150... I was a fish out of water and so was she. We nearly pranged her plane in the process. Unless Sara's husband is a CFI, he probably has no business playing checkout pilot.
Concur.
Just curious, how experienced are all of your instructors? Are they seasoned veterans or fresh guys with barely 250 hours?
I think he just did...
Just curious, how experienced are all of your instructors? Are they seasoned veterans or fresh guys with barely 250 hours?
Throwing a student into a checkride he knew she'd fail is growing a spine? That's pretty weak if you ask me.
Instead of confront the problem head on, like he should, he sluffs it off to someone else? Most students I've seen bust a ride didn't just throw in the towel, they want to be retrained and take it again.
I fail to see your logic in how tossing a student into a known bust solves the issue?
He should man up and tell her he's done, if in fact, that is what is happening. To borrow a phrase, you are still assuming facts not in evidence.