I thought it was implied.
That's OK, we all know what happens when I ASSume things....
Especially when you know what I think is incongruent (there's that word again) with your assumption. You may need a better Derby helmet.
I thought it was implied.
That's OK, we all know what happens when I ASSume things....
Especially when you know what I think is incongruent (there's that word again) with your assumption. You may need a better Derby helmet.
I'm pretty far from average.
Thanks you just reminded me I need to sell all that stuff. Will help me buy new tires and it is just sitting there. They will last a lifetime though (the skates cost more than $500) so I may keep them. The other stuff, not so much.
Ummm, which direction???
Ummm, which direction???
Does this mean all the times I have gotten a boo boo that I was a "victim"?
-John
And which dimension?
I'd say if you got a boo boo burning your finger on a hot pot, you were the victum of your own stupidity.The story said that two "victims" were treated at the scene.
What does that mean anyway? Their injuries were so minor there was no need to take them to a hospital, like when you burn your finger on a hot pot?
Does this mean all the times I have gotten a boo boo that I was a "victim"?
-John
NTSB factual out: http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief2.aspx?ev_id=20120402X20544&ntsbno=ERA12FA265&akey=1
Engine had the wrong #1 and #2 cyls on it.
an experimental amateur-built amphibious Seawind 3000, N514KT...was substantially damaged[/QUOTE]
A postcrash fire destroyed the cockpit and consumed the airframe, with the exception of the outboard 8 feet of the right wing and small composite fragments. The outboard 56 inches of the right aileron and outboard 11-inches of the right flap remained attached. Both right wing fuel tank caps remained installed. The right elevator tip was located on the roof top. All three landing gear were located in the debris, as was the top portion of the vertical fin.
I oft wonder what it takes (in the FAA's opinion) to destroy an aircraft.
an experimental amateur-built amphibious Seawind 3000, N514KT...was substantially damaged[/QUOTE]
I oft wonder what it takes (in the FAA's opinion) to destroy an aircraft.
I have always thought the same thing.... The most glaring example was the Leeward P-51 that crashed at Reno last year... The plane was nothing but itty bitty pieces and the NTSB called it " substantially damaged"
NTSB factual out: http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief2.aspx?ev_id=20120402X20544&ntsbno=ERA12FA265&akey=1
Engine had the wrong #1 and #2 cyls on it.
The broker was fatally injured in a Seawind 3000 accident that occurred in Sarasota, Florida, on January 12, 2013 (NTSB Accident Number – ERA13FA109).
engine that was installed on the accident airplane was previously installed on a Piper PA32RT-300, N2221G that was involved in a fatal accident on March 7, 1993, after it experienced a partial loss of engine power
Here is video of the roof of the Publix from Volusia County Air-One Helicopter:
http://youtu.be/W0EPi99DaWE
Lotta bad luck here!
I see that the deceased's estate is now suing everyone in sight. How charming.
http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20130523005375/en/Kim-Presbrey/Seawind-3000-crash/plane-crash
Lotta bad luck here! They're also sure taking their sweet time with this. A year and a half for the factual? I wonder if they'll ever get to probable cause.
But yeah...
Crazy.
Lotta bad luck here! They're also sure taking their sweet time with this. A year and a half for the factual? I wonder if they'll ever get to probable cause.
But yeah...
Crazy.
I wouldn't make too much out of that, the Big Bear crash happened in '93, the engine was overhauled in 2001 by a known shop. Now, according to the factual, there were some cylinders on the engine that didn't belong there, it'll be interesting to find out whether the OH shop installed them or whether they were installed when the seawind came out of hibernation.
Cursed engine.
Do you even know how the NTSB works? Do you even know how many investigators there are in each district?
What is the value of coming up with a "quick" final in the investigation?
use of extremely flammable and combustible materials
So, was he flying a Cirrus?
*runs away*
I oft wonder what it takes (in the FAA's opinion) to destroy an aircraft.
More proof airplanes should not be sold to lawyers.
I see that the deceased's estate is now suing everyone in sight. How charming.
http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20130523005375/en/Kim-Presbrey/Seawind-3000-crash/plane-crash
Lotta bad luck here! They're also sure taking their sweet time with this. A year and a half for the factual? I wonder if they'll ever get to probable cause.
But yeah...
Crazy.
I see that the deceased's estate is now suing everyone in sight. How charming.
http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20130523005375/en/Kim-Presbrey/Seawind-3000-crash/plane-crash
Yep, looks like Charlie is getting sued.
Presbrey is a former president of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (ITLA)
Named as defendants in the suit filed today are the companies which designed and sold the Seawind 3000; the companies which designed, built and sold the aircraft’s engine, fuel injection system and fuel pump; the companies which completed a major overhaul of the aircraft in 2001; and the party who performed the pre-purchase inspection and certified the plane as airworthy in January 2012, and performed maintenance and service on it between January and April 2012.
Yet another reason my name and certificate numbers will not appear in any more logbooks.
Well, you're still at risk of being sued for every logbook it's already in!