...How much did you pay for that airnav search again ?
$20.00 I sent Paulo a $20 donation in the early days.
Anything else?
...How much did you pay for that airnav search again ?
You're wrong. I don't click on banners, and I dont click on logos. I go to the airport page and click to read the comments.
The issue is that AirNav presents the comments section as an independent review site for FBOs. It isn't, and they don't make it clear that reviews may be selectively edited by their paid advertisers, deceiving the reader and disrespecting those who take the time to leave reviews.
It's their right to run their business however they see fit, but that doesn't change the fact that comments posted on their site cannot be viewed as credible.
Additionally the other side of the coin is that there are those that will trash an FBO because they are a competing business. I recall one such incident where the instructors of one Flight School piled on and trashed a competing FBO/Flight School, simply in my opinion because they were a competitor.
This one bothered me:
http://airnav.com/airport/KEDU/A#c
Jeff, I copied them on these threads so they would realize there was a problem. Glad to hear it has the desired effect. Maybe in the future more could work with them directly before the forum bashing. But then maybe some of them needed it....!
Your presentation of airnav must be different from what I get if I pull up an airport. There is a section with the information for the different FBOs, logo on the left, a list of their services and some ad-copy on why I should spend my money with them. On the right side of the ad is a link with the comments. There is no general comments section on the airport that I can see. If the FBO is run by the airport, it just has an entry for 'City of Gumblefunz airport operations' with the same layout as the ad for a commercial FBO.
If you look at airnavs comments policy, that would actually be a violation of their TOS for the comments section and a business so slandered should be able to get comments posted by a competitor removed.
The thing to keep in mind with airnav is that this is not a big corporation but basically a guy with some rented server space and a secretary to handle all the griping from users and FBOs. Three people total or thereabouts. The lady you get the email responses, the IT guy and the onwer.
It wasn't that blatant. The competing FBO was t posting the comments it was thier employees, mostly CFIs,so it was a bit hard to prove.
I admit that I'm quite puzzled by your description. When I pull up the airport (on their web site), I get a page with the FAA airport data, and the associated businesses are listed at the bottom. I don't see any ad copy in this area. I can then click on "read" or "write" under the "Comments" column.
$20.00 I sent Paulo a $20 donation in the early days.
Anything else?
They are clearly presenting their services using their own corporate identity materials and ad copy. If this is not an advertisement, what is it then ??????
Actually, that's not what appears on the main airport data page; that "ad copy" doesn't appear until you actually click on the FBO for more information.
Go start a facebook group 'FBOs that suck and why' get your pilot friends to join and theirs and so on.
Foreflight also has a comment functionality.
Woah, you use foreflight?
I recently posted on AirNav.com what I feel was well deserved criticism for Ace Aviation at 35D in Allegan, MI. I was again at this airport today and experienced similar issues and went to check the comments and noticed that you have put this in your comments section: "Ace Aviation has requested that AirNav not collect or publish user comments. For any feedback or customer service inquiries, please contact Ace Aviation directly." I also recently put a comment about the FBO at KBKW and when I just went in I don't even see the FBO listed anymore.
To me this is censorship and really defeats the purpose of AirNav's service. Many pilots including myself use AirNav to see the experiences of other pilots and to determine if there may be potential issues. I have seen before where a less than desirable comment is left and the FBO replies with their perspective or an apology which I am totally fine with but to just take the comments down because they aren't all positive is really a big issue to me. My comments were not offensive and only stated the facts of my experience.
I sent AirNav an email today telling them that I think they should reconsider allowing this practice as I believe they will lose credibility with the large group of pilots that use their service to get information from other pilots.
I totally agree with your point about FBO replies and actually I believe that adds credibility as you can tell they care about their service and reputation enough to reply to a customer.
I think the comment about how much we payed for the AirNav search is irrelevant though. If AirNav is going to allow any comments, then they should be comprehensive as long as they don't violate the terms they previously specified. If their sole purpose is for the FBOs to "advertise" then they should remove the comment system.