AirNav Censorship

You're wrong. I don't click on banners, and I dont click on logos. I go to the airport page and click to read the comments.

Your presentation of airnav must be different from what I get if I pull up an airport. There is a section with the information for the different FBOs, logo on the left, a list of their services and some ad-copy on why I should spend my money with them. On the right side of the ad is a link with the comments. There is no general comments section on the airport that I can see. If the FBO is run by the airport, it just has an entry for 'City of Gumblefunz airport operations' with the same layout as the ad for a commercial FBO.

The issue is that AirNav presents the comments section as an independent review site for FBOs. It isn't, and they don't make it clear that reviews may be selectively edited by their paid advertisers, deceiving the reader and disrespecting those who take the time to leave reviews.

I dont see that claim being made anywhere on airnavs website. They are no different from the yellowpages, an advertising directory.


It's their right to run their business however they see fit, but that doesn't change the fact that comments posted on their site cannot be viewed as credible.

It is the internet. They can't say anything that isn't true on the internet.
 
Additionally the other side of the coin is that there are those that will trash an FBO because they are a competing business. I recall one such incident where the instructors of one Flight School piled on and trashed a competing FBO/Flight School, simply in my opinion because they were a competitor.

If you look at airnavs comments policy, that would actually be a violation of their TOS for the comments section and a business so slandered should be able to get comments posted by a competitor removed.

The thing to keep in mind with airnav is that this is not a big corporation but basically a guy with some rented server space and a secretary to handle all the griping from users and FBOs. Three people total or thereabouts. The lady you get the email responses, the IT guy and the onwer.
 

Davis really doesn't have an FBO to complain or delete a post. Actually they (the University) could probably care less....
They usually have pretty reasonable prices and were the local best the other day. They usually are one of the three or four lowest in the area with Rio Vista, McClellan, Nut Tree, and maybe Woodland. I've sent in updates to Airnav when they change, how else does Airnav get their input?
PS: currently EDU 5.41 vs. PAO 6.41.........!
 
Last edited:
Just a note that I received a phone call from Derek Mulder of Ace Aviation this afternoon asking me about my concerns. I described to him my recent issues that I have encountered there this year. I'm not sure if anything will change but I do commend him for taking the time to call and at least listen to my concerns. My feedback was by no means meant to slam Ace Aviation. It was critical but stated the facts of my recent experiences at 35D in an effort to 1) inform other pilots and 2) give the FBO feedback on how their service is being viewed. My bigger disappointment is with AirNav for allowing comments to be removed/disabled. As many of you have stated there may be many good reasons for this but it definitely lowers the credibility of the service in my opinion.
 
Jeff, I copied them on these threads so they would realize there was a problem. Glad to hear it has the desired effect. Maybe in the future more could work with them directly before the forum bashing. But then maybe some of them needed it....!
 
Jeff, I copied them on these threads so they would realize there was a problem. Glad to hear it has the desired effect. Maybe in the future more could work with them directly before the forum bashing. But then maybe some of them needed it....!

Please re-read my posts. I don't feel that I ever did any "forum bashing". My concern was that I originally posted my feedback on AirNav when comments were allowed by this FBO then when I went back a few weeks later I noticed that comments had been removed. By posting my comments on AirNav I was doing what I felt was justified to give the FBO feedback and inform other pilots of my experiences.

If you also notice from my posts my concern was with AirNav allowing removal of comments and I did also follow up with them directly with an email which I posted their reply here in the thread as well.
 
Your presentation of airnav must be different from what I get if I pull up an airport. There is a section with the information for the different FBOs, logo on the left, a list of their services and some ad-copy on why I should spend my money with them. On the right side of the ad is a link with the comments. There is no general comments section on the airport that I can see. If the FBO is run by the airport, it just has an entry for 'City of Gumblefunz airport operations' with the same layout as the ad for a commercial FBO.

I admit that I'm quite puzzled by your description. When I pull up the airport (on their web site), I get a page with the FAA airport data, and the associated businesses are listed at the bottom. I don't see any ad copy in this area. I can then click on "read" or "write" under the "Comments" column.

AvWeb states, through their comment policy link at the top of each comment section, that the comment forum is provided as a service to the general aviation community (not to serve the advertisers). I did a cursory read of the entire policy, and didn't see any mention that FBOs or other businesses had editorial control over comments. Even AirNav doesn't appear to claim editorial control over comments, unless the comment violates the policy or where AirNav may elect to correct issues with spelling or grammar.


JKG
 
If you look at airnavs comments policy, that would actually be a violation of their TOS for the comments section and a business so slandered should be able to get comments posted by a competitor removed.

The thing to keep in mind with airnav is that this is not a big corporation but basically a guy with some rented server space and a secretary to handle all the griping from users and FBOs. Three people total or thereabouts. The lady you get the email responses, the IT guy and the onwer.

It wasn't that blatant. The competing FBO was t posting the comments it was thier employees, mostly CFIs,so it was a bit hard to prove.
 
It wasn't that blatant. The competing FBO was t posting the comments it was thier employees, mostly CFIs,so it was a bit hard to prove.

6. Comments about a business or organization are not allowed from representatives of a direct competitor.

Don't know if an employee counts as a 'representative', if I was running the aggrieved FBO I would certainly try to make that case.
 
I admit that I'm quite puzzled by your description. When I pull up the airport (on their web site), I get a page with the FAA airport data, and the associated businesses are listed at the bottom. I don't see any ad copy in this area. I can then click on "read" or "write" under the "Comments" column.

You must have a different airnav than what I get if I just pull it up on a standard web browser.

Just go to the OSH airnav entry. The ad for Basler has their logo on the left, contact information and then in the center it states 'Oshkosh's LOWEST price for 100LL is found at Basler Flight Service! Self-service 100LL available 24 hours a day' If you click on the comments link, you get to their full-page ad that starts with

Basler Flight Service - Your Full Service FBO at OSH for Over 50 Years!

It is our mission to make your flight to and from OSH as smooth as possible, even when the air isn't!

We offer -
- full service 100LL and JetA
- self-service 100LL available 24 hours a day
- the LOWEST fuel prices at OSH
- aircraft parking and hangar
- catering, lodging, & ground transportation assistance
- and more!

Fly in to Basler Flight Service today, and see for yourself that 50 years of FBO experience really does make a difference!

You can reach us at 920-236-7827 or on the web at www.baslerflightservice.com

They are clearly presenting their services using their own corporate identity materials and ad copy. If this is not an advertisement, what is it then ??????
 
$20.00 I sent Paulo a $20 donation in the early days.

Anything else?

I did as well and was one of their "Airboss" customers for a while before bad customer service let me slip away.
 
They are clearly presenting their services using their own corporate identity materials and ad copy. If this is not an advertisement, what is it then ??????

Actually, that's not what appears on the main airport data page; that "ad copy" doesn't appear until you actually click on the FBO for more information. I have no issue with that. However, the comments section is separated from the FBO information and--according to AirNav's own policy--is presented as a forum for user comments about the FBO, not as part of the FBO's ad, and certainly not subject to editorial control by the FBO or for purposes of advertising. That would be consistent with most other sites which accept both advertising and user comments, and therefore inline with most end users' expectations, regardless of official policy. AirNav says one thing and does another--that's the issue.


JKG
 
Actually, that's not what appears on the main airport data page; that "ad copy" doesn't appear until you actually click on the FBO for more information.

The only place I can find a link to the user comments is if you click the link on the right side of the FBO ads.

Is there any other place on the airnav site that provides a link to the user comments ?
 

Attachments

  • FBO_Ad.JPG
    FBO_Ad.JPG
    37.7 KB · Views: 8
Go start a facebook group 'FBOs that suck and why' get your pilot friends to join and theirs and so on.

Better, a real website that documents comments added and removed from Airnav. Track dates/times, and keep the posts available. Compare ratings in real time. That'd be fun.

Always a blast to use tech against bad ethics.
 
Hmmm.
I love AIRNAV.
It gets me the airport information I need when I want it.
AND it's free.
 
I recently posted on AirNav.com what I feel was well deserved criticism for Ace Aviation at 35D in Allegan, MI. I was again at this airport today and experienced similar issues and went to check the comments and noticed that you have put this in your comments section: "Ace Aviation has requested that AirNav not collect or publish user comments. For any feedback or customer service inquiries, please contact Ace Aviation directly." I also recently put a comment about the FBO at KBKW and when I just went in I don't even see the FBO listed anymore.

To me this is censorship and really defeats the purpose of AirNav's service. Many pilots including myself use AirNav to see the experiences of other pilots and to determine if there may be potential issues. I have seen before where a less than desirable comment is left and the FBO replies with their perspective or an apology which I am totally fine with but to just take the comments down because they aren't all positive is really a big issue to me. My comments were not offensive and only stated the facts of my experience.

I sent AirNav an email today telling them that I think they should reconsider allowing this practice as I believe they will lose credibility with the large group of pilots that use their service to get information from other pilots.

I suggest you use Foreflight. There are NO comments presently listed for 35D.
 
Any FBO can fail at providing good customer service on any given day. When this happens and a negative comment is posted on Airnav, the FBO should simply post the following response, "XYZ Aviation strives to provide the best customer service possible and values customer comments. The poster has been contacted to address their experiance with our company".
 
Last edited:
I totally agree with your point about FBO replies and actually I believe that adds credibility as you can tell they care about their service and reputation enough to reply to a customer.

I think the comment about how much we payed for the AirNav search is irrelevant though. If AirNav is going to allow any comments, then they should be comprehensive as long as they don't violate the terms they previously specified. If their sole purpose is for the FBOs to "advertise" then they should remove the comment system.

Its their business and they conduct it how they see fit. You can use it or not. Thats the beauty of free market enterprise.
 
Back
Top