The Christavia.Are there any E/AB kits or designs that follow a Champ's lines and dimensions?
That Christivia Mk4 4 place looks pretty good. Why have not heard about it before now? Anyone know or have seen one?The Christavia.
https://www.aircraftspruce.ca/categories/building_materials/bm/menus/kits/christavia.html
Edit: Oops, that's the Canadian site. For the majority here: https://www.aircraftspruce.com/categories/building_materials/bm/menus/kits/christavia.html
There are hundreds of homebuilt designs, and the more popular tend to be slick-looking, much faster machines. The Christavia/Champ has that maiden-aunt charm that doesn't appeal to most pilots.That Christivia Mk4 4 place looks pretty good. Why have not heard about it before now? Anyone know or have seen one?
Do you know of any other high-wing designs that have larger doors and a possible side by side option that would allow a tall, older person to get in and out fairly easy? An old friend first lost his ability to roll into his Super Cub then lost his medical. We started looking at Champs and now E/AB to keep him focused forward.There are hundreds of homebuilt designs,
Sure. The Cyclone. Not cheap to build. http://www3.sympatico.ca/st-justaviation/Do you know of any other high-wing designs that have larger doors and a possible side by side option that would allow a tall, older person to get in and out fairly easy? An old friend first lost his ability to roll into his Super Cub then lost his medical. We started looking at Champs and now E/AB to keep him focused forward.
There are only 65 in the FAA registry.That Christavia Mk4 4 place looks pretty good. Why have not heard about it before now? Anyone know or have seen one?
I'd go with the suggestion of the Glasair, Sportsman.Do you know of any other high-wing designs that have larger doors and a possible side by side option that would allow a tall, older person to get in and out fairly easy? An old friend first lost his ability to roll into his Super Cub then lost his medical. We started looking at Champs and now E/AB to keep him focused forward.
I assume you are looking for something that qualifies as an LSA?Do you know of any other high-wing designs that have larger doors and a possible side by side option that would allow a tall, older person to get in and out fairly easy? An old friend first lost his ability to roll into his Super Cub then lost his medical. We started looking at Champs and now E/AB to keep him focused forward.
As much as he thinks he can get his medical back, I'm thinking of pushing him to LSA. So the answer would be yes. And my thinking is we can further modify the airframe to make it as easy as possible for him to get in.I assume you are looking for something that qualifies as an LSA?
Unless you really need the extra seats, the medical just isn't worth the trip. You can tell him I said so.As much as he thinks he can get his medical back, I'm thinking of pushing him to LSA. So the answer would be yes.
I tried that tack. And look where it got me. At 78, he want's to build it which is fine with me. He's been building aircraft and engines forever. This would be his 1st E/AB.If your "old" friend is old, he has to take that into account. Might be better to buy a decently-built homebuilt and get on with the flying.
If you had to guess, do you think the Wag-a-Bond uses J3 parts like the original Vagabond did? He has a number of J3 parts "in stock."Wag-Aero's wagobond
It's my understanding it's only 2 place whether tandem or side-by-side???Forgot that the LSA is a tandem seat tho....
He doesn't need the seats. I think he's starting to internally realize he's on the downhill side which has led to the E/AB discussion. And the reason I'm helping him with this. He's been flying since 15 and flew big-iron professionally from 21 to 65 reaching the top 10 seniority listing at a major airline. I don't win many debates with him but will pass your message along.Unless you really need the extra seats, the medical just isn't worth the trip. You can tell him I said so.
Negative on the denial. He let it expire. He's been through the medical loss/regain hoops before due to previous issues and understands the limitations. But thanks for the info.if he applied for a medical and was subsequently denied.
Well, in my defense, in your post. #6 you stated that your friend “then lost his medical.” That usually means “denied”. Glad to hear it just expired. He should be good to go on the Basic Med route.Negative on the denial. He let it expire. He's been through the medical loss/regain hoops before due to previous issues and understands the limitations. But thanks for the info.
That pretty much rules out Basic Med and light sport.
For my own knowledge, the reference on this would be 61.53 and by extension 61.23(c)?He should be good to go on the Basic Med
Rans S20 appears to fit the bill - big wide doors, seat moves back easily. The big issue would appear to be be the seat height off the ground.Do you know of any other high-wing designs that have larger doors and a possible side by side option that would allow a tall, older person to get in and out fairly easy?
As much as he thinks he can get his medical back, I'm thinking of pushing him to LSA. So the answer would be yes. And my thinking is we can further modify the airframe to make it as easy as possible for him to get in.
Well, in my defense, in your post. #6 you stated that your friend “then lost his medical.” That usually means “denied”. Glad to hear it just expired. He should be good to go on the Basic Med route.
The S-20 is an expensive airplane, as far as RANS go. I'd start with S-6S Coyote II. Gear is not particularly tall on it - just tall enough to permit easy boarding (admittedly, from a perspective of a taller pilot).Rans S20 appears to fit the bill - big wide doors, seat moves back easily.